MedVision ad

How accurate are SAM/UMAX? (2 Viewers)

tanna

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
178
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
SAM: 97.45
Umax: 98

ATAR: 98.05

They underestimated me! Shame on them...
 

Akaru-Hime

Rawr~
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
35
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
UMAX was unbelievable. Predicted 99.85 ... which was exactly what I got. >.<

SAM was a little disappointing. It predicted 99.75 UAI, which wasn't too far off I suppose. =3
 

alice09

New Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
17
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
einstein 09 was right on the money 4 me with 99.10 and it was my highest predictor :D sam and umax underestimated with 98.75 and 98.95
 

annabackwards

<3 Prophet 9
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
4,670
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
UMAX estimate - 99.05
JUAI estimate - 99.20
Einstein estimate - 99.25
SAM estimate - 99.00

Actual ATAR - 99.00 :)
 

ajdlinux

Mod: ANU, ATAR/HSC Marks
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
1,890
Location
Port Macquarie / Canberra
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Does anyone know the difference in the calculation methods used by each of the calculators? They're all based on the same underlying UAC scaling statistics, so why is it that they can be sometimes significantly different from each other?
 

eloxquence

Member
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
43
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
sorry to bump this thread with my less than 97 atar...

but UMAX said 91.85 and thats what i got. sam said 90.85
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top