Richard Gilmore
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 270
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
I particularly enjoy the way that you, instead of answering a given question, ignore it with an outrageous accusation!
I've spent the past couple of years on this forum trying to argue logically with you. All I get is a headache because you cherry-pick and straight out lie.I particularly enjoy the way that you, instead of answering a given question, ignore it with an outrageous accusation!
lolI've spent the past couple of years on this forum trying to argue logically with you. All I get is a headache because you cherry-pick and straight out lie.
Not worth it Neb.
fertiliser is made from ammonia, which (shock horror) requires hydrogen. hydrogen comes from natural gas - an oil refinery by-product.nitrogen doesn't come from fertilizers you are getting mixed up dude. Nitrogen comes from the atmosphere.
Yeah, that pretty much sums up Neb's central thesis.there is only ever one way of doings things in science
new discoveries are never made
Lots of energy and not efficient.you can get hydrogen from electrolysis too...
obtaining energy through processes that use up more energy than they provide is FANTASTIC way to do business.you can get hydrogen from electrolysis too...
cool strawman dickwad. i don't deny they exist. i deny that your knowledge of chemistry exists - sure, but i don't deny that they exist. what i do deny is that they're alternatives to what we have now unless massive, sweeping, gaping changes are made. changes that would be the end to the world as we currently know it. changes involving a lot less people...Slidey said:Yeah, that pretty much sums up Neb's central thesis.
Oh look, dry distillation. Oh look, urea. Oh look, destructive distillation.
None of these exist according to Neb.