MedVision ad

HSC 2012-14 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (5 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ikki

Active Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
130
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon


(without using complex numbers)
Bloddy crazy question, started off like this is gonna get me no where, nek minnet:

Let







So I guess we could write this...






Now let u=2x for the sin 2x integral and evaluate the ln2 one:




Ok, lets consider the sinx integral by itself because the boundaries pose a problem...
Let



For the second integral, sub u=pi-x.



Thus,


Back to our integral question!





*Well it seems i'm a bit late LOL oh well, was worth a shot. Thanks Braintic atleast I know i'm right haha
 

Ikki

Active Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
130
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

*If one sketches the function inside the absolute value it is clear that the graph from 0 to infinity is positive.

Let the integral be I.

So integrating by parts using u=e^-x and dv=sinx then further intigrating by parts again we end up with:

I=[e^-x(cosx+sinx)] {0}{infinity}-I
2I=[e^-x(cosx+sinx)] {0}{infinity}
2I=1
I=1/2

*Not sure if i was assuming there...

EDIT: Yes i was, the curve must cut the axis every kpi... :(
 
Last edited:

dunjaaa

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
473
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

I don't think that is the answer, because you are essentially minusing the negative region from the positive region when integrating e^-xsin(x)
 
Last edited:

dunjaaa

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
473
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Oh wow, condenses a 10 marker question into 1 question, typical Sy...
 
Last edited:

dunjaaa

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
473
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Screen shot 2014-05-23 at 12.39.51 AM.png
Alternatively: Screen shot 2014-05-23 at 8.17.40 PM.png changing it into cosine would make the integration less tedious and error free
 
Last edited:

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Congrats on that other question HAHA :)

Can you explain how you got to the second step? to the cosec^4
That's just auxiliary angle method.
 

Ikki

Active Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
130
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

So wait... Is it auxillary angle method? JKS haha
Nice job mate :p

Q:Prove that the derivative of arccot x=-1/(1+x^2) by considering y=arccot x.
Hence integrate 1/(1+x^2)dx.

*Idk maybe too easy lol

General Q: How would one approach this integral:
x^3/(2x-1).dx
 
Last edited:

dunjaaa

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
473
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Screen shot 2014-05-23 at 10.46.04 PM.png, alternatively for (b) use polynomial division since deg(numerator)>deg(denominator)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 5)

Top