HSC 2014 MX2 Marathon ADVANCED (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

dunjaaa

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
473
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

oh dear lord, cant imagine what the other questions are gonna be like
 

mreditor16

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
3,169
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

hi guys, a quick integration question - soz don't know how to use latex

integral of root ( x / 1-x ) dx

from 0 to 0.5
 

Kurosaki

True Fail Kid
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
1,167
Location
Tubbytronic Superdome
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

hi guys, a quick integration question - soz don't know how to use latex

integral of root ( x / 1-x ) dx

from 0 to 0.5

Is that enough of a pointer to get you started?

Edit: Consider the derivative of . It's
So then,
 
Last edited:

mreditor16

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
3,169
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

nup still don't see it - help me out?
 

mreditor16

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
3,169
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

dw i got it anyway - i needed to substitute x = sin^2 theta. thanks anyways!
 

dunjaaa

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
473
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Screen shot 2014-05-04 at 6.09.19 PM.png without substitution
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Induction is enough Sy, I posted a proof of this in the jensen's article I wrote a little while ago. Will post the proof again here when I get home...it is quite short.

Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
 

Davo_01

Active Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
116
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Yea I quickly wrote the question up, I thought with part(ii) it would be straightforward induction, but I don't think it is.


Here is one (I did this one)

I tried it with induction, heres what i did:
From part i, we know it is true for n=2.

Let us assume true for n=k


Prove true for n=k+1






Letting , and hence using assumption...





Hence proven by Induction
 
Last edited:

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

I tried it with induction, heres what i did:
From part i, we know it is true for n=2.

Let us assume true for n=k


Prove true for n=k+1






Letting , and hence using assumption...





Hence proven by Induction
Yep, this is pretty much correct. The only thing you have to be wary of is a potential division by zero when dividing by sum of the first k w's. But this is not a big deal.

The article I mentioned earlier is attached anyway.

View attachment jensen.pdf

one error correction: replace the words "by convexity" with "since f'' >= 0" in the proof of theorem 1.3.
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

This is a good question

 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Sy123, I just wanna say SCREW YOU because this question (worded slightly differently) was a potential consideration for this year's BoS trials
Let me guess, 11a)???
 

TL1998

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2014
Messages
39
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Don't know how to use Latex so....

Given that f'(1) = 2, f(1) = 1, evaluate the following the limits

A) Limit x->1 ( (f(x)-x^2*f(1)) / sin(x-1) )

B) Lim x->0 ( (f(2-cosx)-f(1)) / x^2)
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Don't know how to use Latex so....

Given that f'(1) = 2, f(1) = 1, evaluate the following the limits

A) Limit x->1 ( (f(x)-x^2*f(1)) / sin(x-1) )

B) Lim x->0 ( (f(2-cosx)-f(1)) / x^2)


 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

 

TL1998

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2014
Messages
39
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

given that a>0, and b>0,
prove that Integral(a->0) ln(x+1)dx + Integral(b->0) (e^x-1)dx is greater or equal to ab
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

 

TL1998

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2014
Messages
39
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

BTw sy you made a silly in your response to my previous question, part A.

you wrote -h+2 but it should be -h-2. But it doesn't really matter
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

I don't really buy this solution...

Is the first sentence saying that f' must attain a maximum or minimum on the interval [a,b]? Why is this true if we don't know whether or not f' is continuous?

The work that follows also seems to depend on signs a bit, though depending on what exactly you mean by your first line this might be okay.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2014 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

An attempt at a more formal solution:





 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top