Drsoccerball
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2014
- Messages
- 3,650
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon
For :
For :
Stumped on Q3.
.For :
I'm confused by this question; whenever I try and make a substitution, the boundaries become equal (usually both become 0 - this is what should have happened to you in your second last line)
Still didn't get the correct answer. Can someone check my method?
Could you possibly post your working?I did partial fractions and i got the answer...
I don't see why it should be equal in my second last line, I used substituion of t = tan2x, where x = 0 and x = pi/2I'm confused by this question; whenever I try and make a substitution, the boundaries become equal (usually both become 0 - this is what should have happened to you in your second last line)
Could you possibly post your working?
Thanks. That's quite interesting how you change the limits from 0 to infinity - it never would have occurred to me that this was even allowed, but it makes sense
Another way which may be a little faster is to divide top and bottom by e^(kx) and it's a log integral.
You can turn the upper limit into T and then let T appraoch infinity, but it works pretty much the same way here.Thanks. That's quite interesting how you change the limits from 0 to infinity - it never would have occurred to me that this was even allowed, but it makes sense
OMG didnt see this D: i let x = lnu then multiplied top and bottom by u^(n-1) and got an integral which gives me your answerr:/
Letting u=x^2+1/x^2 also works nicely.For :
Or you can sub in u=e^(kx) and use partial fractions.Another way which may be a little faster is to divide top and bottom by e^(kx) and it's a log integral.