HSC 2015 MX2 Marathon ADVANCED (archive) (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Note sure if correct:
<removed> fixed version 2 posts below
added RTP line.
 
Last edited:

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Your LHS in the 'RTP' line is not always less than 2.5. E.g. in an equilateral triangle, all angles are 60º, and cos(60º) = ½, so your LHS is then 2•(½ + ½ + ½) = 3.
I realised that and was trying to look for which line was wrong.
It has been found.It was a dumb error in failing to carry a constant of 2 through on some terms.
<removed>
fixed version is below
 
Last edited:

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

I realised that and was trying to look for which line was wrong.
It has been found.It was a dumb error in failing to carry a constant of 2 through on some terms.
View attachment 32240
It still says LHS ≤ 2.5 on the second last line (this could just be a typo, I haven't read through the proof, just skimmed it).
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

I realised that and was trying to look for which line was wrong.
It has been found.It was a dumb error in failing to carry a constant of 2 through on some terms.
View attachment 32240
nvm
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

The proof looks solid, well done

Here was my approach:











 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Can I post a question:
Needs fixing just wait...



You may assume or derive a suitable formula for the area of a triangle in terms of the sides or angles.
Knowing the angles of a triangle isn't enough to determine a unique area, since the triangles could have different sizes for given angles (they would all be similar triangles).
 

shervos

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
39
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Show that 4m^2+17n^2 and 4n^2+17m^2 cannot be both be perfect squares, where n, and m are positive integers
 

simpleetal

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
54
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Show that 4m^2+17n^2 and 4n^2+17m^2 cannot be both be perfect squares, where n, and m are positive integers
by letting each of the expressions equal to u^2 and v^2 respectively, we can deduce that m and n must both be odd for u and v to be integers. Hence, we only consider the case where m and n areboth odd integers. But this is a contradiction as for each expression, upon division by 8, we get a remainder of 5 on the lhs(all odd squares have remainder 1 when divided by 8) while on the rhs we have remainder 1 (since u and v are both odd if m, n both odd)
 

glittergal96

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
418
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Finishing off the cubic question (finally!):

It remains to show that for a polynomial with three real roots, the inequalities:

1. |bd-c| < 1-d^2

and

2. |b+d| < |1+c|

imply that all three roots live in the open unit interval.

As discussed in my previous posts, inequality 2 implies that p(1) > 0 and p(-1) < 0, which means there is at least one real root in the unit interval.

If all three roots DON'T live in the unit interval then either two of them are at least 1 or two of them are at most -1. (By considering the limiting behaviour of p at +inf and -inf.)
Let us assume we are in one of these cases for the sake of contradiction.

For inequality 1 to hold, we must of course have d^2 < 1. (*)

We also have that the polynomial q(1)= 1-d^2 - (c-bd) >= 1-d^2 - |c-bd| > 0. (q was defined earlier as the polynomial with roots the pairwise products of the roots of p).

This means that either zero or two of the quantities



exceed 1, with the others being less than 1. (**)

As at least two of these roots have the same sign, this observation implies that all three roots must have the same sign.

So we are left with the possibilities:





In the first of these, we have from (**).

This means we can multiply

which contradicts (**).

Similarly, in the latter of the two possibilities, we have:



So

again in contradiction with (**).

This completes the proof.
 
Last edited:

glittergal96

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
418
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Find all functions such that



for all rational .

(Note that is the set of rational numbers.)
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

This is more like an Olympiad Marathon than a Q16-worthy HSC 4U Marathon haha.
 

VBN2470

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
440
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2017
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

Find all functions such that



for all rational .

(Note that is the set of rational numbers.)
Set to get . Not sure how to go from there.. :p

I can see that the function defined by such that is a solution, but not sure how to show it (let alone other possible solutions).
 

VBN2470

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
440
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2017
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon - Advanced Level

I tried that as well as plugging in , but got an equation which I'm not sure how to manipulate..

Not too experienced/familiar with these functional equations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top