Benovista
Old Schooler
How did everyone do in the trial for IPT?
I came 7th in my school WOOHOO!
I came 7th in my school WOOHOO!
IPT Trial results... (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Benovista
- Start date
honky tonk
in Miracle World
I got 84% and came 2nd, so I was pretty happy.
It lowered my overall average, but only to 93.4, so it didn't make much difference.
It lowered my overall average, but only to 93.4, so it didn't make much difference.
i feel for ya.. i hate those ppl that get like 90 and r like damn i wish i got 95!!Originally posted by miz_fly
my skool really sucks...highest was 58%...stoopid exam paper
my skool averagely goes okay..
getting my marks tomoz!! aaaaah!
Benovista
Old Schooler
can i hear from the stupid people please?
lawrencema_1985
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2003
- Messages
- 23
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2003
i did the cssa trial and got 82% and came first. Lost one or two marks in too many questions...
*~Dazed~*
fuck a duck
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2003
- Messages
- 1,177
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2003
hey did you do the independent? because our average was 47.5%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Originally posted by miz_fly
my skool really sucks...highest was 58%...stoopid exam paper
i got 56% which is fucking rediculous considering ive always gotten like AT LEAST 85% in ipt throughout the year... dont know what the highest is... we have a lot of quiet people in my class that dont like to revela their marks.... lets hope that im still coming first... brought my overall mark down from 89.5 to 86!!! im very shitty but still happy i guess considering how much i fucked the trial.... please please please i hope im still first
Lundy
Banned
65% which was way above the average. One of the top marks, I think. Says something about our class, lol.
SXC_DRAGON_BOY
Been A While
i got 62% in the independant paper...
the highest i think was like 82%, then 77%, then 72% then me...
from what i see people didnt do to well in it, i thought i went alright, but far when my marks came out they were a shocker. guess the same went for most people.
i would have like over 70%, 60% looks real bad
the highest i think was like 82%, then 77%, then 72% then me...
from what i see people didnt do to well in it, i thought i went alright, but far when my marks came out they were a shocker. guess the same went for most people.
i would have like over 70%, 60% looks real bad
haha k pplz i got hell bad.. i got 40%.. average was 48% how bad is that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i got 3rd in my class!!!! .. stoopid teacher
but my overal rank i got 7/44 so me happy i finally got a single digit hehe yay
but my overal rank i got 7/44 so me happy i finally got a single digit hehe yay
...
^___^
i did the indepandent paper in class...
have u guys see the marking criteria? coz to be honest, looking at some of the questions, it wasn't "hard" (no cocky meaning behind), so i was thinking was the marking guideline really strict?
have u guys see the marking criteria? coz to be honest, looking at some of the questions, it wasn't "hard" (no cocky meaning behind), so i was thinking was the marking guideline really strict?
*~Dazed~*
fuck a duck
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2003
- Messages
- 1,177
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2003
yeah '...' i think it was very strict... our teacher followed it plus marked a little bit harder.... well for instance in the question about Jack and the server and etc.. i think it was question 22, for part c & d i got 1/3 & 1/3... its bullshit because i fully talked about everything that i could but yet it wasnt good enough... also we had to answer a question in TPS i think where you had to talk about the technology, participants and their effect and i got 1/3...yet had ticks showing me that the stuff i mentioned in each of the three parts of the question was right... i dont get it... i talked about technology, both hardare & software, talked about participants and the effect of these... how can you possible get 1/3 unless you said the WRONG thigs when i obviously said the right things because she ticked each point i made...
bloody independent paper, the catholic was soooooo much easier
bloody independent paper, the catholic was soooooo much easier
Lundy
Banned
Maybe because some of your points, while valid, weren't on the marking criteria. Or maybe that's just the teacher's way of marking things, like they go tick crazy or something
...
^___^
well, for the CSSA one, theres this question that did not have the words Explain or describe in the question, yet the marking criteria expects u to write the definition of the word...i told this to my teacher and he goes..."thats why every yr, markers throw chairs at each other coz of shitty problems like this..."
*sigh*
Lundy
Banned
Yeah, quite a few times I've lost a mark or two when I dont define the term I'm discussing, even though the question doesn't state that you're supposed to provide definitions.