Yes, how can absolution have any idea what he is on about when he says shit like thatNot-That-Bright said:Tell that to the chinese living in the poorer provinces.
Yes, how can absolution have any idea what he is on about when he says shit like thatNot-That-Bright said:Tell that to the chinese living in the poorer provinces.
Technological advances is such a lame point. We would have come up with them anyway.Not-That-Bright said:Technological Advances,
Economic Benefits,
Establishment of several treaties & alliances which gave helped to unite and stablise most of western europe.
Yes, in theory it does, in theory its the can be considered the best system, its when it is actually implemented that it is distortedNot-That-Bright said:Communism DOES support in theory distributing wealth to the most needy
Meh, thats because the Chinese economy is semi-deregulated leading to a greater divide in income distribution. They are now only Communist in ideology, not in economy.Not-That-Bright said:Tell that to the chinese living in the poorer provinces.
Yeah good point.mcdickpants 2.5 said:no one answered me
i win i win
i do agree about the positive outcomes of worldwar II, but im conflicted over it. Also, worldwar two was brought about by an entirly different situation. i dont see how you can really compare it to whats happening in iraq. Its closer in resemblance to Vietnam. a pre emptive attack on something that the american government was afraid of.
Yes but without the war, they might not have seen the errors of war, and during the war women were able to work in the workforce and also in traditionally male occupations. Since WW2 the defence industry has provided jobs for many ppl around the world, strengthening the economyabsolution* said:Technological advances is such a lame point. We would have come up with them anyway.
Economic benefits? Doubtful when the entire nations wealth is being spent on defense not to mention the disruption of the workforce through massive re-structuring.
And youll find most of the treaties and alliances were only signed because countries saw the horrific nature of war and didnt want to experience it again.
Are u serious, even though it distributes wealth, the most effectively in theory, i still wouldnt support itNot-That-Bright said:I disagree with it being the best system in theory, if i truely believed that I would strive for communism.
LOOK. Youre going to UWS. Im going USYD. I am clearly better than you in every facet of existence. Now go away.Korn said:Yes but without the war, they might not have seen the errors of war, and during the war women were able to work in the workforce and also in traditionally male occupations. Since WW2 the defence industry has provided jobs for many ppl around the world, strengthening the economy
What difference does uni have to do with anything u self rightous wankerabsolution* said:LOOK. Youre going to UWS. Im going USYD. I am clearly better than you in every facet of existence. Now go away.
yeah it was directed at korn, i forgot to quote himNot-That-Bright said:I said i don't think it's the best model lol
Settle petal. I was having a go at NTB moreso than yourself..Korn said:What difference does uni have to do with anything u self rightous wanker
Why, would u want to work ur arse off and get paid the same wage as someone who does jack shitmcdickpants 2.5 said:that doesnt make any sense.
why would you not strive to achieve the best economic/political model>