This pretty much. Aligning can fluctuate quite a bit from year to year, so it should be taken with a grain of salt and be used as a general guide only.the database is based on the aligning from previous years.
So technically it's not right, however it gives you an approximation of what you will need in order to obtain a certain mark
Markers come from any school, whether they are ranked at the bottom or the top.even top 10 schools, ncoul?
i hear a lot of markers come from top 10 schools and private schools, i find it hard to believe they would mark differently from one to the other. in fact, other teachers would attempt to discuss with them and mark like them i reckon.
This too.I'd say that the db marks could be used as a genuine guide, but I'd have larger reservations as to how people think they could achieve those marks. As speculated often on this forum, the marking criteria of the HSC markers is largely more stringent and rigorous than your school's marking trends and I wouldn't expect to achieve the same marks.
When you receive your paper back after buying it and notice you were given 0/3 for a calculation you got 100% correct, but were given the 0 for having too many words in your answer, then you will understand HSC science marking.dont go to a selective school but like, looking at marking guidelines for chem prehsc. they looked pretty fair to me. so i don't really get what the whole fuss is about to be honest.
No it can happen, happened to TWO members on here last year. A correct answer doesn't guarantee full (or any) marks.that doesnt happen.
they have to give 3/3 if the answer is correct im pretty sure. but you can't get 1/3 or 2/3 if it's wrong. so showing working is essential.
how do you buy your marks btw, i might do that out of curiosity if its not too expensive.
There should be an option online when you receive your HSC marks.how do you buy your marks btw, i might do that out of curiosity if its not too expensive.
wtf?No it can happen, happened to TWO members on here last year. A correct answer doesn't guarantee full (or any) marks.
They had working out, they lost the marks for being too "wordy" when dealing with a calculation. i.e. instead of just using the symbol 'n' for moles, they said "the moles of sodium is: ...", they did this for every step of the calculation and were given 0.
People don't realise it's not just about having the correct answer, but showing it using the correct technique. It's just like how you have to use a ruler and pencil for diagrams. For calculations you have to format it how a calculation should be written out, that includes not having sentences explaining every single detail.
Yep they bought them back. I'll find the thread where the guy somewhat complains. I've seen the exam he bought back and can vouch it happened.wtf?
thats ridiculous....did these people by their exam scripts??
he shoulda complained. that's what i woulda done.Yep they bought them back. I'll find the thread where the guy somewhat complains. I've seen the exam he bought back and can vouch it happened.
It may be put down to dodgy marking, but that just shows it can happen to anyone.
Edit: http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?t=298166
Go to his chemistry short answer comment. Once BOS released the answers we confirmed he got the calculation right.
meh he still got .95 lolhe shoulda complained. that's what i woulda done.