Well if you do don't do Hamlet, there's a huge chance you'd have to do Lear. Though you could always have does "The Tempest" (not sure which module that's in) or Julius Caesar for Representation and Texts cos they make you do a Shakespeare.
Is Ted Hughes Sylvia Plath's husband? I'm really annoyed cos I have to do 1984 for Texts and Representation and I would've loved to do TElling the Truth, but I hadn't done a novel yet.
We didn't get a say in our texts either but I'm so glad I'm doing what I'm doing. Compared to the other classes in my skewl, i def. think our class got the best deal. Excepting perhaps the class that doesn'thave to do Skrzynecki's poetry for change, they get to do Harwood's instead.
For the speeches module, they're interesting and I'll def. know Havel, Lincoln, Keating well. I know enoughabout King without studying it and if I studied it I'd end up writing too much. Socrates I know well as well, just cos I do. I'm not sure i'll bother with Pearson or Atwood, as much as I like Atwood, it desn't fit in too well with the rest of the texts. Cicero's too long to do in depth, and I'll just learn some quotes, I know the techniques alright. I have a good memory so that makes things easier. I haven't even read McAleese and I can't stand Goldman. Our skewl specified Goldman in the trial!!! Who've I missed? Aung San Suu Kyi, can't stand her either, I'm not exactly sympathetic to the whole feminism thing.
Havel's a genius though, I lvoe his speech. And cliche as Keating's is, it's very well written I think.