ok maybe you could have tied it into the nature of the law, if you approach that 'critically analyse' question extremely broadly. but otherwise i don't think so. i interpreted that question to mean, discuss the interplay between aboriginal customary understandings of life - ie the connection between land and intellectual property - and the Australian Legal System, and the way in which the ALS does not consider the way in which Aboriginal people think about the world when creating and building upon the law. That is, ideas about land ownership and artistic works are, under the law, not part of the same principle(which is fundamentally a eurocentric view) , and in this way, Aboriginies suffer under the legal system which refuses to acknowledge Aboriginal culture, spirituality and heritage. Also a motivator for 'white man' and his law is money - cf. Mabo case not changing the constitution [or the interpretation to include dispossession of Aboriginal land] s 51 (xxxi) because of the huge payouts which would ensure if such a shift in conceptual understanding were to occur.