• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

LAWS1052 in-class test (3 Viewers)

Newbie

is a roflcopter
Joined
May 17, 2003
Messages
3,670
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
:D

just because most people who do law havent done legal studies :p
 

sugared plum

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2003
Messages
302
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
Originally posted by Newbie
critical evaluate decision

ohhh it wasn't critically evalute his decision?? omg then i totally did it wrong... i thought it was about his idea about aboriginal spirituality etc and its place in the legal system ahhhh
 

sugared plum

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2003
Messages
302
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
not that either ??

dude no more exam talk it all ends badly, and usually worse than the actual results
 

Newbie

is a roflcopter
Joined
May 17, 2003
Messages
3,670
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
anyone someone save me
how would the argument of artificial reasoning and natural reasoning be connect to bulun bulun?
 

sugared plum

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2003
Messages
302
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
ok maybe you could have tied it into the nature of the law, if you approach that 'critically analyse' question extremely broadly. but otherwise i don't think so. i interpreted that question to mean, discuss the interplay between aboriginal customary understandings of life - ie the connection between land and intellectual property - and the Australian Legal System, and the way in which the ALS does not consider the way in which Aboriginal people think about the world when creating and building upon the law. That is, ideas about land ownership and artistic works are, under the law, not part of the same principle(which is fundamentally a eurocentric view) , and in this way, Aboriginies suffer under the legal system which refuses to acknowledge Aboriginal culture, spirituality and heritage. Also a motivator for 'white man' and his law is money - cf. Mabo case not changing the constitution [or the interpretation to include dispossession of Aboriginal land] s 51 (xxxi) because of the huge payouts which would ensure if such a shift in conceptual understanding were to occur.
 

addz

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2003
Messages
193
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
hmm.thats pretty damn detailed..
dont think i "critically" analysed enuff..ahh well..
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Top