iamsickofyear12
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2004
- Messages
- 3,960
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2004
That is exactly the way it should be.leetom said:If women adhered to your view of childbirth, they would not be having children until they had 'the ability to pay for childcare'
Just because I am a Liberal Party supporter doesn't mean I agree with all of their policies. Parents should not have children unless they can afford them, and if they can never afford them then they should never have children. I think it's stupid that other people end up paying for their kids. I don't particularly want kids, but if I do have them I don't expect anyone else to pay for them.leetom said:People work. You can't just demand a relative to look after your child. It's unfair. If women adhered to your view of childbirth, they would not be having children until they had 'the ability to pay for childcare'. My point is that delaying childbirth is at odds with a chief Liberal Party goal, which is urging women to have more children. (One for the father, one for the mother, nation etc..)
As you have expressed yourself as a Liberal Party supporter, I find your stance on childbirth stupid.
Also, childcare is very expensive and more importantly, there is massive shortage in childcare places, so even if a student mother can afford childcare, she probably won't be able to find a place. Which is why childcare facilities exist on campus, funded by student contributions.
It's fine that childcare services exist on campus to address the shortage issue, but I don't want to pay for them because I'm not using them.