tacky said:
If such boutique investment banks (e.g. Mac Bank
) are so respected compared to Citigroup then why has the former World Bank president James Wolfensohn, along with his deputy, Shengman Zhang (who resigned soon after Wolfensohn left) joined Citigroup joining the likes of Stanley Fisher (former #2 of the International Monetary Fund), Robert Rubin (former US Treasury Secretary) and Gerald Ford (former president of the United States) at Citigroup.
I never said that Mac Bank was a boutique IB. In fact it is Australia's biggest IB. Last year it topped the 2005 Thompson Financial ladder for equity capital markets, capital raising and floats.
In Australia last year it raised over $8billion,
more than any other IB in Australia. UBS was second with $6.8billion.
Macquarie also had the highest paid CEO in Australia for 2005.
The point I was illustrating was that when it comes to IB's market capitalisation doesn't mean shit. Citigroup also has a shitload of employees. I would rather work for a smaller company.
Ummmmm......dunno maybe Mac Banks meagre $11b market capitalisation had something to do with it losing the $25b T3 float to some other more cashed up IBs......dunnoo......
As I said Macquarie raised the most amount of capital in Australia and also had the largest market share in 2005.
T3 is an advisory role. Why the fuck would amounts of money mean anything for why the government is choosing a particular bank for an advisory role? As it happens it looks as though it has been given to UBS and Caliburn. Caliburn is an independent house with far less money and resources than Macquarie. Your argument here is completely invalid.
You hav still failed to argue why market capitalisation means anything for evaluating whether a company is good or not. Especially when comparing an international bank to a domestically based one.
$18.5m (I suppose this is in Aussie Dollars) LOL!!!!!! what a joke!! If I was Alan Moss I would stop getting ripped off by Mac Bank and quit and join Citigroup as a junior analyst or something at Citigroup's Smith Barney brokerage division. In 2002, Sanford Weill's the then CEO of Citigroup was paid USD $785 million (the highest-paid executive in the world).
I have never said that Macquarie is bigger than Citigroup.
We live in Australia. Macquarie has the highest paid CEO in Australia.
Citigroup is an amazingly large company with masses of interests all over the world and the capital to buy pretty much anything they want. That doesn't mean I'd want to work for them.
Comparing Macquarie which is based in Australia and only floated in 1996 to massive American IB's only makes you look like an absolute dolt.
Why would I want to work for Citigroup in Australia over Macquarie which is the biggest in Australia just because Citigroup is big overseas.
Of course I would prefer to work in a US IB than be in MBL's New York Office however.