I wasn't suggesting in any way that females were of inferior intellect. The males I know may be wrongfully neglecting the subject and missing out on minor details whereas the girls may be covering everything with more depth and accuracy. This thread is about the different ATTITUDES I observed, not who was the superior economist. If I thought that males were better at economics then I'd ask for something like different marks, not attitudesaileenli said:
.
When I said 'study' I meant the EXTRA work that you do outside of school. The people who don't 'study' and top Economics are the ones that really listened in class, do the homework, and leave it at that. No extra kind of revision. And how do they do it? Far out, I don't even know. I guess you can say they're the naturally talented people. What goes in the ear don't come out the other side and just stay in their big brains.Sparcod said:
To be honest, not very hard. I write a few extended responses every once in a while, and do short answers sometimes.. but it's nothing compare to what I do for other subjects. I would say I've done a total out about 3 or 4 hours of eco since graduation.. and that was nearly 3 weeks ago. I do 4 hours of maths A DAY. So as you can see... yeah.. not very hard at all =_=Sparcod said:
that's because its your hardest subject, by a long mile.Gator said:
yeah, we should go back to bartering things, let alone interest rates, credit, international trade, bonds, hedging, and private equity.aileenli said:
