Maths Q7 c (1 Viewer)

donrob15

New Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
25
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
part i was easy finding the descriminant
how do you do part ii? i ad some i dea but couldnt actually put down an answer. i mey need to know this for extension 1 so any help would be appreciated.
 

JJPH

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
21
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
What was the actual question, im pretty blurred out.

Something to do with K, parabola and not intersecting 2x - 1 or something?
 

earthnfire

New Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
17
Gender
Female
HSC
2006
donrob15 said:
part i was easy finding the descriminant
how do you do part ii? i ad some i dea but couldnt actually put down an answer. i mey need to know this for extension 1 so any help would be appreciated.

I'm pretty sure my answer is right. I wrote:

ab = c/a = 1

as: ab=1
b= 1/a
Therefore a + 1/a is the same as a + b = 3
So a + 1/a = 3

Hope this helps...goodluck with the rest of your exams.
 
Last edited:

chainedchaos

New Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
8
Gender
Female
HSC
2006
Where y=2x^2 +kx + 9 does NOT intersect with y=2x + 1:

2x^2 +kx + 9 (is not equal to sign) 2x +1

then you just rearrange it to get 2x^2 +(k-2)x + 8 which is now not equal to zero. So you put the discriminant(from i) < 0 because there are no real roots.
Then you cansolve the inquality like any other quadratic inequality
 

earthnfire

New Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
17
Gender
Female
HSC
2006
Lol...soz...i just realised i answered the wrong question...i answered 7a. I can't help you with 7c...i had the same trouble as you...lol

but goodluck with ur other exams anyway
 

shinji

Is in A State Of Trance
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
2,733
Location
Syd-ney
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
oh, this is easy. lol

just wats it me called ..... solve them simulataneously

and then u should get a similar equation to the one in part II or sumin
and then u use the discriminate equation from part I or watever
and then u just make it less than 0 ~~
 

donrob15

New Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
25
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
i figured it out :)

you let the straight line = the parabola in part 2. you make it all = 0 and you end up getting the discriminant you found in part i. the discriminant has to be <0 for it to not intersect the st line. solve x for discriminant<0. i got -6<k<10. i only wish i knew that in the test.
 

Benmc

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
118
Location
Bathurst
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Yeah i got the two K values but i didn't know the equation had already gotten the curves/ lines merged together.

There i skipped it and didn't bother completing and just had the stupid k values. I knew it was going to be an inequality but i thought i had to rewrite the equation for the two lines to be solved, but it was already fcuking rewritten. BOS could have said that. Bastards
 

s2indie

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
123
Gender
Female
HSC
2006
Dammit. I was practically there! Just didn't pen it down. :(
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top