TheWolfsLunch
Member
Noone's bothered to make a topic about Module C yet, so here it is. How'd everyone go?
I tried to say like, their form was unique (I did Memento, that movie takes a bit to get used to), and so it created different views of history and memory and their interplay, all that sort of bullshit. I raved on about how they depicted it through their techniques and textual form too.Meh. I wasn't sure how I was meant to convey unique and provocative in specifics. So I just said that The Fiftieth gate was unique and provocative through it's midrash technique of combining the past and the present. And for my related...bullshitted...just said something about how it's purpose made it unique, and the way its techniques made it provocative. Don't think I did that well
that's kinda not fair?????He'll get marked for one related and the other one won't be marked.
But you can do two.that's kinda not fair?????
it did say ONE related. you can't just do 2 ...
This. There's no penalty imposed but considering you wasted time doing 2 instead of 1, you'd lose marks for lacking detail anyway.But you can do two.
You won't be marked on it, and all the time you spent setting up points/arguments/whatever on the second text will not be marked.
I'd assume a couple of good paragraphs will not marked and there are probably chunks of the main argument missing.
It's not like it's an advantage in anyway at all to do two.
hm.... trueThis. There's no penalty imposed but considering you wasted time doing 2 instead of 1, you'd lose marks for lacking detail anyway.
YES! I said how their textual form was unique to their medium etc etcI tried to say like, their form was unique (I did Memento, that movie takes a bit to get used to), and so it created different views of history and memory and their interplay, all that sort of bullshit. I raved on about how they depicted it through their techniques and textual form too.