NSW State Politics (1 Viewer)

NSW State Election: 1st preference


  • Total voters
    8

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Hey, can't let the trolls keep you from having a discussion now. :sun:
Yeah I was just tired at the time I wrote it. To begin with I was a bit cheeky in what I wrote, "senior liberal politician". Given I don't know much about the other states, that could be said to include Lawrence Springborg, Barry O'farrell, Jillian Skinner, Mike Baird, Ted Ballileiu, Isabelle Redmond, Collin Barnett, Will Hodgman, Tony Abbott, Malcolm Turnbull, Julie Bishop, Joe Hockey and Eric Abetz.

As a holder of very progressive views it shouldn't really be a surprise if I ticked Redmond, Barnett, Springborg, Abbott and Abetz from that list. Ignorance is no excuse but I really don't know much about Skinner and Baillieu so would hardly claim to like them by any stretch. Julie Bishop I used to be a defender of but was appalled at the way she used security intelligence as a political football. Mike Baird is a bit like Stephen Conroy, the backstabbing opportunist, forever playing friends against each other to advance his own position.

I don't actually dislike Joe Hockey, George Brandis or Will Hodgman which brings me to what O'farrell does that I approve of. To begin with I don't find the lack of policies a problem, I consider it sensible politics. Opposition policies released a year in advanced of an election either get picked to pieces in scare campaigns or absorbed into government policy. Particularly given he took over the leadership four years out from an election he absolutely could not afford to play his cards early.

I trust that with O'farrell you are actually getting the politics of the man at the helm rather than those of a 12 faceless men in grubby raincoats. He was touted as the alternative leader for several years but kept declining it for fear of trying to lead under a mandate from an unholy alliance of powebrokers. He only took the leadership after Debnam fell over and he had more or less won over the party majority in his own right. I don't think in the modern political world to have a leader with such genuine authority as O'farrell has should be treated lightly.

On O'farrells political positions I think he is closer to the centre than most. I recognize that left governments won't always maintain government and I'd rather someone who is clearly not xenophobic, homophobic, chauvinistic or a climate skeptic be the next conservative government of NSW rather than some of the bigots and nutters that do still sit in the parliaments. He was a critic of Howard's refusal to apologise to the stolen generation incase you were unaware.

O'farrell wants to slowly rollback payroll tax. That is a good thing it is the dumbest of dumb taxes in existence. If there is one tax which undeniably reduces employment it is payroll tax. He wants to return planning powers to the local councils, given the NSW government clearly lacks the resources to fund all its responsibilities I think planning at a micromanagement level should be left to the councils. If the government was wealthy and could afford to pay the administrators necessarily i might support centralizing local planning in Sydney and taking he broader view but they just don't have the money, it is not viable. He wants to remove fixed terms and return to a system similar to the federal one which is just plain good sense.

Obviously I will reconsider when the full coalition policies are released when they head into the election campaign (when they should be) but generally his performance has commanded a degree of respect.
 

aussie-boy

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
610
Gender
Male
HSC
2008

17028354

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
190
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
unfortunately i don't want to legalise marijuana, and i don't intend to debate that topic here.

as for NSW state politics..

the NSW labor party have been a joke,
but i certainly don't want the liberal party in power either.
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
It probably means incumbent party.

Edit: Oh, you're talking about the poll for this thread. It means the option you voted for.
 
Last edited:

niloony

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
144
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Voting for the greens, normally i wouldn't like to see them hold so much power but NSW politics needs a good shake up to get both parties back on the rails...
 

FlipX

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
65
Location
Narnia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I don't actually dislike Joe Hockey, George Brandis or Will Hodgman which brings me to what O'farrell does that I approve of. To begin with I don't find the lack of policies a problem, I consider it sensible politics. Opposition policies released a year in advanced of an election either get picked to pieces in scare campaigns or absorbed into government policy. Particularly given he took over the leadership four years out from an election he absolutely could not afford to play his cards early.

I trust that with O'farrell you are actually getting the politics of the man at the helm rather than those of a 12 faceless men in grubby raincoats. He was touted as the alternative leader for several years but kept declining it for fear of trying to lead under a mandate from an unholy alliance of powebrokers. He only took the leadership after Debnam fell over and he had more or less won over the party majority in his own right. I don't think in the modern political world to have a leader with such genuine authority as O'farrell has should be treated lightly.

On O'farrells political positions I think he is closer to the centre than most. I recognize that left governments won't always maintain government and I'd rather someone who is clearly not xenophobic, homophobic, chauvinistic or a climate skeptic be the next conservative government of NSW rather than some of the bigots and nutters that do still sit in the parliaments. He was a critic of Howard's refusal to apologise to the stolen generation incase you were unaware.

O'farrell wants to slowly rollback payroll tax. That is a good thing it is the dumbest of dumb taxes in existence. If there is one tax which undeniably reduces employment it is payroll tax. He wants to return planning powers to the local councils, given the NSW government clearly lacks the resources to fund all its responsibilities I think planning at a micromanagement level should be left to the councils. If the government was wealthy and could afford to pay the administrators necessarily i might support centralizing local planning in Sydney and taking he broader view but they just don't have the money, it is not viable. He wants to remove fixed terms and return to a system similar to the federal one which is just plain good sense.
Good points to consider. Thanks for filling us in.

Voting for the greens, normally i wouldn't like to see them hold so much power but NSW politics needs a good shake up to get both parties back on the rails...
This is the view I'm leaning towards at the moment - primary vote to the Greens, and preference Coalition after. I don't mind K.Ken so much as I mind the back-room internal politics of NSW Labor...
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
It's so pathetic that somebody who would just be able to present themselves as being remotely close to a normal human being with an inkling of logic would probably demolish either party in the elections.

The amount of brain dead scum in politics at both an federal and state level is amazing.
I used to be a strong critic of presidential-style politics, but now I realise that having a directly elected president/prime minister/premier would help prevent exactly the type of shit going on in federal and state politics today. Instead of a party of out-of-touch geriatrics electing the leader, the will of the people would.

Instead of a social conservative we'd have social progressive as the leader of the country.
 

abbeyroad

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
891
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I used to be a strong critic of presidential-style politics, but now I realise that having a directly elected president/prime minister/premier would help prevent exactly the type of shit going on in federal and state politics today. Instead of a party of out-of-touch geriatrics electing the leader, the will of the people would.

Instead of a social conservative we'd have social progressive as the leader of the country.
well in a presidential system like the US's the candidates are still chosen by their respective parties and due to the high entry barriers ie the costs of running a campaign etc it's hard for an independent to run, essentially it's the same shit just different name tbh.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top