HBP is released on 7/16. Although I would love a licence plate like that
16/7! Unlike america, our date format is logical ie date/month/year.
Yeah, Im not a big fan of fanfiction. I've read a few that have been decent, but generally I'm going to agree with Argonaut, most of it does suck. It's good when I'm bored and can find a good story, but they are so few and far between I haven't even tried from a while...
As for slash, no, don't like snarry. It, aside from turning my favorite character into a paedophile, basically, it's just wrong. I don't see any of that kind of behavior redeeming or whatever people put it forward as, it's just morally and legally wrong. LOL, and no worries, generalise all ya like, mate
I've liked Snape ever since PS. I'd never been a big fan of Harry, so the way Snape treats Harry doesn't really matter to me
No, it's more I find Snape alot more interesting than Harry. But then, when you compare an 11-year-old to a 30-year-old, the latter is bound to have a few more layers. You see, Snape is like an Ogore. And Ogores are like Onions. They have layers and more importantly, they make people cry.
He has never been black and white, from the first book, he was saving the life of someone he hated, and yet he still did it. As the books went on, and we learn more of him, we understand him less, and thats why I like him, you never know what side he's on, wether it be Voldemorts, or Dumbledore's or maybe - and quiet possibly - he's screwing everyone over to save himself, or he's just fighting for himself. He's complex and mysterious which is something very few characters can claim. They're either good or evil with no room for interpretation.
Which also brings my Slytherin thing in. While I agree that in cannon, the characters we mainly see - ie Malfoys, Lestranges, Crabbes, Goyles, Pansy etc - are all pretty horrible. But, you also have to remember, it's through Harry's eyes we see em', so his natural hatred of the house will make him bias, to target those truly horrible people within tis house. There are bullies and nasty peices of work in his own house, I think his trip into the pensive will show that nasty Gryffindors do indeed exist. Peter Pettigrew shows that those other than Slytherin do become death eaters. And up until OotP, I think most people, even myself, would have agreed the hexing and what not was a two way street, but that one little Pensive scene shows it possibly wasn't. I would have expected that Snape would have been attacked as pay back, but according to James, it was 'more the fact he exisits'. While it doesn't proved a good reason for turning out like he did (although, I'm hoping we do get more background in the next two books), it does show James and Sirius for the bullies they were, and that the Slytherins aren't always the bad guys.
But then, they have always been the 'outcast' house, the evil ones under the lake. From the moment they enter Slytherin they're somehow below the rest of the school. The loss of a Slytherin isn't as bad as the loss of a Hufflepuff or Ravenclaw or, god forbid, a Gryffindor. You can tell, in the eyes of most, lossing Slytherins are seen as acceptable losses, in order to save the other three houses. The way Snape favors his house is a little more than just 'keeping up apperances', probably pay back too. Undoubtly through school, everytime something went wrong when he and MWPP were around, he got the blame, even if it clearly wasn't his fault. Much like he places blame on Harry when Draco does something and he knows it was Draco.
The fact that so many Slytherins end up as DE is a testiment to how little the school as a whole cares, imo. Sure, you have your Malfoys that are bound to end up following LV, but nobody has even tried to deter them, or help them, as far as we can see.
Once again, I just see Slytherin as being more complex than any other house. People see 'cunning' and 'ends justify the means' and think evil. Then you see Snape who uses his cunning to fool Voldermort, and his 'end justifies the means' attitude is that no matter what happens to him, as long as he keeps spying LV just might meet his end, even if it means saving his school day enemy's kid alive, saving him from situations he constantly gets himself into.
So, as far as I'm concernced, Slytherin isn't evil, its just the schools perception of the house. They're by no means an 'angel' house, but they have no inbuilt characteristic that would turn them evil, it's that they are told they are the evil house. They're told that enough and they believe it.
Well, that made very little sense, but I felt a need to defend Slytherin because I don't think they're as evil as they're made out to be.