faintygirl83
Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2007
- Messages
- 69
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- N/A
Will the 'earlier reforms' towards the bottom of the first post actually be in place? Or were they just reforms that were proposed but not taken up?
People do research to support their ideas and get what they want. I doubt anyone has ever done a real test comparing talking on the phone to talking to someone in the car because they want phones banned. If they did a test that showed talking on the phone and talking to a passenger was the same thing then that is less likely to happen.Libbster said:What is the difference between having a conversation on a mobile hands-free and having a conversation with a person in car?! Both are equally distracting.
I think it's a stupid idea, how are they going to police it? Cops aren't going to be able to see into the car to see a mob phone and car kit when you go driving past.
Thats means they already exist sweetiefaintygirl83 said:Will the 'earlier reforms' towards the bottom of the first post actually be in place? Or were they just reforms that were proposed but not taken up?
Thanksmr_brightside said:Thats means they already exist sweetie
So you'd also be for a ban on conversation inside the car (between the driver and passenger) ? That's would be consistent with your reasoning.mr_brightside said:Mobile phones should be banned for everyone. Its not holding something to your ear that causes the distraction. It's having a conversation that is the distraction.
It would be consistent with research that shows its the actual conversation that causes accidents.volition said:So you'd also be for a ban on conversation inside the car (between the driver and passenger) ? That's would be consistent with your reasoning.
That's true but based on most research banning phones cannot be justified if you can still use hands-free.seremify007 said:Not too fond of the blanket ban on phone usage for all drivers... whilst it seems fairer, the reality is- it ain't gonna happen. A lot of the people who pay loads of taxes rely on their phone to conduct business in the car... not necessarily just when driving, but even when stuck in traffic.
Get new friends.. your ones are douches..nah i was fine, but when they are screaming shit out the window and waving their hands in front of you from the back seat and rubbing yr hair, it DOES become distracting lol.
yep, and at least the old ppl have a vote loliamsickofyear12 said:The words you are looking for are age discrimination.
Think about what would happen if they tried to apply these restrictions to old people. There would be outrage and they would never let it happen.
And at least people actually pay attention to what old people have to say, nobody listens to the opinions of young people.... even though we're the ones this is going to affect.volition said:yep, and at least the old ppl have a vote lol
word.Sprinkles~ said:The passenger rule is the stupidiest thing I've ever heard. They're just punishing us, even the ones who drive responsibly (better than some full liscence drivers I bet). It's just going to enourage drink driving and have more P-platers out on the roads because they can't all go in one car etc...
I think a properly consider restriction (something that would actually do some good) would be much better than media pressure forcing a knee jerk reaction from a committee of morons that includes someone who is apparently now an expert just because his son died in a car accident.Legham said:^Mm.. i agree it should be far later.. The nights still young at 11pm! I think 2am or even later would be more appropriate.. by then the drivers usually aren't driving to get from A to B, they're usually driving cause they have nothing better to do..