omg! really?! there was a movie that took longer than 6 weeks to shoot? that completely shoots down my theory after you provided ONE example. notice how i said 'hollywood' movie, and not 'huge budget special effects demo'. and what exactly does the length of shooting (not 'making' as you said, which is completely different) actually have to do with anything? you make this claim based on some imaginery fairy logic, methinksCharlieB said:lol you are a fucking idiot......the matrix reloaded took like 300 days to shoot. most hollywood blockbusters take more than 4-6 weeks to shoot. anyway, the matrix is on a totally different scale compared to phone booth. it obviously shows that the length of making of a film means something.
your not alone, I thought it was one of the most crapiest movies I've seen.= Jennifer = said:today i rented phone booth it looked interesting and when i watched it, it was crap, has anyone else seen this movie what did they think of it?
i really really hope your kiddingReshie said:that movie was soo awesome considerin it was done in i think like 10 days(told in dvd extras)
No.. according to the November Specs Sheet from the MPAA, the current average for filming is 3.75 months.crazyhomo said:your average hollywood film is shot in 4-6 weeks.
link ?honky tonk said:No.. according to the November Specs Sheet from the MPAA, the current average for filming is 3.75 months.