AlleyCat
Singing me and Julio
i think total war or the stalemate. it basically covers everything.
-
Looking for HSC notes and resources? Check out our Notes & Resources page
Predict The Topic Of The Hsc Question!!!!! (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter myusername
- Start date
kimi
C U Next Tuesday.
So it seems the majority consensus is saying total war/homefront, post-war expectations and stalemate? i might focus on those mainly then- i just have no time to do study for everyyyything in ww1.
pig_93
Member
does that mean we dont need to crap on about an historian? or we dont even need quotes?Peartie said:
im lost when it comes to this so called 'historiography'
jdrockefeller
Member
It's source analysis and YOUR own knowledge. So no.pig_93 said:
Basically, in the 10 markers, you don't need intros or conclusions. They aren't essays. They are short answer responses.
Götterfunken
Member
Though having a quote, for a few statistics can make a 8 mark answer into a 9-10 mark answer.
AlleyCat
Singing me and Julio
quotes and statistics arent necessary to achieve full marks in this question.Götterfunken said:
Götterfunken
Member
No, I didn't say that. My point was if you have an answer that wouldn't get full-marks by itself, having a few quotes or statistics may boost your mark.AlleyCat said:
kimi
C U Next Tuesday.
Wouldnt having some relevant quotes and statistics allow the marker to get the impression that you do in fact, have great knowledge about what you are talking about? I agree, it can boost your marks veryyy easily but if you still give a correct answer and show you do know the topic, without historian views- you can get full marks also.
Though, im gonna try and be safe by gathering some quotes that i can use and know that i can apply to any topic in ww1.
Though, im gonna try and be safe by gathering some quotes that i can use and know that i can apply to any topic in ww1.