• Want to take part in this year's BoS Trials event for Maths and/or Business Studies?
    Click here for details and register now!
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page

Q3(a) WTF!!!! (1 Viewer)

thunderdax

I AM JESUS LOL!
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
278
Location
Newcastle
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
OK, who else was confused with question 3 a (ii)? Halving the interval gives 0.8, but if you halve the interval again then it becomes obvious that 0.7 is a closer approximation than 0.8... Is this the right way to do it or should I have just said 0.8?
 

queenie

I know what ur thinkin...
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
517
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
it said once.. i think i just left it at 0.8
 

stv_87

New Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
24
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
i think i said 0.7 because it said to one decimal place so u cant use 0.75 and then 0.7 is better than 0.8. i was bewildred initially but 0.7 is correct though i did not study that cause face it that was three gift marks. if wrong then so many people would have done 0.7 ie 99% of state and the other one percent would have just instinctively used newton, cause thats what it usually is.
 

EvilDude

New Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
18
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Didn't say once. Just said use the method. After 2 it was closer to 0.7, I said 0.7
 

thunderdax

I AM JESUS LOL!
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
278
Location
Newcastle
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Now I'm feeling better about it. Thanks for that. Halving the interval is such a crappy technique because of this.
 

who_loves_maths

I wanna be a nebula too!!
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
600
Location
somewhere amidst the nebulaic cloud of your heart
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Originally Posted by EvilDude
Didn't say once. Just said use the method. After 2 it was closer to 0.7, I said 0.7
that question was horrifically worded. they should, in theory, accept both 0.7 or 0.8 as the right answer.

yes sure the question didn't say used the method ONCE. BUT, it also didn't mention anything about a BETTER or CLOSER approximation either!
so any approximation (within reason) should be acceptable, otherwise the question can be construed as misleading.

also, the word "approximation" means exactly that - an approximation. so since the question didn't mention a "better" or "closer" approximation, then that's no reason to discriminate one approximation over the other. as long as one showed the working for halving the interval, then x = 0.8 should be quite a reasonable approximation in theory.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2004
Messages
79
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2005
who_loves_maths said:
that question was horrifically worded. they should, in theory, accept both 0.7 or 0.8 as the right answer.

yes sure the question didn't say used the method ONCE. BUT, it also didn't mention anything about a BETTER or CLOSER approximation either!
so any approximation (within reason) should be acceptable, otherwise the question can be construed as misleading.

also, the word "approximation" means exactly that - an approximation. so since the question didn't mention a "better" or "closer" approximation, then that's no reason to discriminate one approximation over the other. as long as one showed the working for halving the interval, then x = 0.8 should be quite a reasonable approximation in theory.

You put 0.8 didnt you? :D






So did I!:D
 

MarsBarz

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
282
Location
Nsw
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I halved it once. I hope that was correct. I agree that the question was somewhat ambiguous.
 

who_loves_maths

I wanna be a nebula too!!
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
600
Location
somewhere amidst the nebulaic cloud of your heart
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Originally Posted by reggina_calcio
You put 0.8 didnt you? :D

So did I! :D
^ hehe... that's a no-brainer :p

but honestly, i'm not just saying what i did to "defend" myself... i actually consciously thought of all that during the exam whilst trying to make up my mind to put either 0.7 or 0.8

my thinking was that, since 1) the question gave a 0.7 as an approximation already, and 2) that otherwise there's not reason to discriminate between both, than i put x=0.8 down thinking that it was a "safer" answer.

also, after 2 halving procedures - you would arrive at x = 0.75 . let's say you decide to stop there (which is reasonable since f(0.75) = 0.003, yet the next iteration gives f(0.725) = -0.02 or something which is not closer than x=0.75 would give), then you would have to round up answer to 2 dec. pl.
i.e. 0.75 ---> 0.8 ! :p
 
Last edited:

_dhj_

-_-
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
1,562
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Since it asks for 1 dec place, you're supposed to give a solution correct to one decimal place. The root was between 0.7 and 0.75 (not inclusive, as neither values give you f(x)=0) after the 2nd approximation, which means it must be 0.7 "to one decimal place" as anything less than 0.75, e.g. 0.74999 would have to be rounded down.
 

Huratio

Moderator - UTS
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
2,504
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
queenie said:
it said once.. i think i just left it at 0.8
i did this as well..
it didn't specify the number of approximations that you had to do. im thinking 0.8 is the right answer.
 

tofu

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2003
Messages
34
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
im thinking because it was 2 marks 1 mark for 0.8 but full marks for 0.7
 

jake2.0

. . .
Joined
Sep 17, 2005
Messages
616
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
well my teacher says that 0.7 is the right answer as you have to keep repeating the process untill the second decimal stops changing
 

richz

Active Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
1,348
WLM, is gonna top mx1 and mx2 this year, i'll put my money on that :D
 

wanton-wonton

Active Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
1,415
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
The root is between 0.725 and 0.75, so to one decimal place, it must be 0.7.
 

word.

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
174
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
this is what you do
the root is approx 7.5 x 10-1 to 1 d.p.
 

haboozin

Do you uhh.. Yahoo?
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
708
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
yea what wanton-wonton did was right..

you half it then half it again (to check your answer)

and its def 0.7...
it was actually in an old hsc where they did the same thing and people got tricked with the same thing....

this is what this yrs's maths was all about - help put off people, so only the best shine.
 

Abtari

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
604
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
the question said use the method of halving the interval to find AN approximation...

this doesnt' neccessarily mean an approximation with one try of the halving interval or with two tries or with three tries or whatever...

because this is not specified, both answers are acceptable.

correct to one decimal place is the most stupid thing i have ever heard for a question like that, which has a root between 0.7 and 0.9... wtf

and, yeah, as for myself, i did it once, got 0.75 and thought nothing of doing it twice, so put o.8 as my answer to 1 d.p.

but seriously, that question is a joke, and noone should fret about whether it is 0.7 or 0.8. The only reason I put 0.8 and did it once was cos it just didn't seem right to put 0.7 as an approximation to a root "between" 0.7 and 0.9 :D
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top