Quadratic inequalities (1 Viewer)

planino

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
559
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
When representing a quadratic inequality, say (x-2)(x-5) > 0 on the Cartesian plane, do you shade the areas above y=0 and outside the parabola, or do you simply emboss the part of actual parabola itself that's above y=0 with open circles at the x-intercepts? Or does either way not matter?
Similarly for (x-2)(x-5) < 0, do you shade inside of the parabola under y=0, or do you emboss the part parabola itself that's below y=0 and draw open circles at the x-intercepts? Or does it not matter which way I choose?
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Embossing the curve is the way to go here since we are working in 1 dimension.
 
Last edited:

RivalryofTroll

Sleep Deprived Entity
Joined
Feb 10, 2011
Messages
3,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2019
When representing a quadratic inequality, say (x-2)(x-5) > 0 on the Cartesian plane, do you shade the areas above y=0 and outside the parabola, or do you simply emboss the part of actual parabola itself that's above y=0 with open circles at the x-intercepts? Or does either way not matter?
Similarly for (x-2)(x-5) < 0, do you shade inside of the parabola under y=0, or do you emboss the part parabola itself that's below y=0 and draw open circles at the x-intercepts? Or does it not matter which way I choose?
Quad Inequal.png

Like this?
 

planino

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
559
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Ok then shading it is, thanks guys! RivalryOfTroll did you use paint?:p
 

D94

New Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
4,423
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I've rarely seen a question like that asking you to shade a region with only 1 variable in a quadratic. Anyway, Wolfram it, and you'll see they concur with Carrotsticks. A more common question would ask you to find the solutions of the inequality.
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Oh dear! I just noticed that it was single variable.

At the time of posting, I read it as (x-2)(x-5) > Y, so putting in some value of Y would result in a region.

Apologies for that.

BUT you could argue the following:

y=(x-2)(x-5)

So (x-2)(x-5) > 0 would be the equivalent of y > 0 bounded by the curve, which would result in the region.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top