Real talk: What is the point in English? (1 Viewer)

futuremidwife

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
1,021
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2017
I've taken English for about 13 years. I saw the importance of it up until year 8. After that, I failed to see the point of it. It's irrelevant, don't you think? I learnt how to write solid, sophisticated essays through my other subjects. About 99.95% of the HSC populace will NEVER study literature in their life again. So, what is the point of it? I see the point in other subjects such as CAFS, and Early Childhood, but I fail to see the point of English. Where did it come from? And why is it compulsory in prelim + HSC? There are some who are not strong in English. Me being the first (clearly), so why am I being forced to take it?

Honestly, I don't know. Enlighten me.
 
Last edited:

seventhroot

gg no re
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
2,809
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
I dont understand. Then why is it compulsory? HAVE THEY NOT REALISED THAT THERE IS LITERALLY NO POINT TO ENGLISH?
there are some reasons like it is a common subject everyone does so they look at how you preform in that and scale/align/magic whatever. It is very complicated (I don't even fully understand the process).

my legal teacher made this video that sort of explains it

 

futuremidwife

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
1,021
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2017
They are making me empathise and write essays about fictional characters who are facing oppression, when I could write about actual people facing oppression and devise ways to solve that. Give me the real shit to talk about. The BOSTES are talking about how they've changed the system, when all they did was change their name, and gave us personalised booklets. Oh, and also fucked everyone over when they changed the structure of the unseen text section.
 

emilios

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
668
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
the reason they say: develop strong communication and analytical skills and higher order thinking.
the actual reason: need a benchmark to compare other subjects to for scaling reasons.

in the end it's all a technicality. they'll never make english non-compulsory, but it's no coz they want people to gush over dickens
 

futuremidwife

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
1,021
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2017
the reason they say: develop strong communication and analytical skills and higher order thinking.
the actual reason: need a benchmark to compare other subjects to for scaling reasons.

in the end it's all a technicality. they'll never make english non-compulsory, but it's no coz they want people to gush over dickens
The BOSTES benchmark subject is unjustifiable. They don't understand that not everyone can string together 26 letters, and not everyone can devise a sophisticated thesis in a response to a theme they prob have never seen before with a strict time limit. It's like math. My teacher always said you need to a natural writer to ace this subject. I could NEVER ace creative writing. I hate it. Thats at least 10 marks that section in the HSC because I do sooo shit in it. Totally a benchmark subject, hey? They need to revise there system man. And aha, "gush over dickens" - totally agree with your points dude. Thanks!
 

BLIT2014

The pessimistic optimist.
Moderator
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
11,592
Location
l'appel du vide
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2018
We live in an English speaking country.
We will need to be writing essays,reportse etc and have the means of being able to effectivally communicate in the written form.

English should stay compulsory, but change the structure...

I mean most people ( Me included, can't even write a proper letter) which is a vital skill :(
 

futuremidwife

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
1,021
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2017
We live in an English speaking country.
We will need to be writing essays,reportse etc and have the means of being able to effectivally communicate in the written form.

English should stay compulsory, but change the structure...

I mean most people ( Me included, can't even write a proper letter) which is a vital skill :(
But they don't teach us how to write letters, essays to the standard required for tertiary education or life in general. I know subjects like society who teach us how to reference, and write academically. Most people are not likely to use the structure for English essays EVER again. I agree English is a vital skill, but the english from year 9 to year 12 is irrelevant and bogus. They should change it into like English life skills, and teach us the real shit necessary for the future Thats what we should learn from, not why Hamlet, a fictional character formulated over 400 years, wants to kill his uncle. Same goes for math. They should have a math life skill, and teach us how to pay taxes, etc.
 

OzKo

Retired
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
9,892
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Uni Grad
2013
I'm inclined to agree.

I would prefer students to be taught how to write strong essays/reports within their own subjects (of course barring subjects like Maths). These skills are more relevant for the real world, and also teaches students how to write analytically.
 

liamlolz

Active Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
127
Location
South Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
I'm not sure how different the scaling and alignment or whatever in the HTC is, but the SACE does not require it in order to do so.
...thank god. I've got 2 more essays to finish and English is over for me!
I've personally learnt how to write better in Biology than English. As far as I can see, senior English isn't about how to write (unfortunately, because many still need to learn)
(hope everyone did well in their English exam!)
 
Last edited:

futuremidwife

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
1,021
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2017
The subject English that we get taught should NOT be compulsory. It's not about learning grammar, spelling, how to write properly - which is what would make me consider it should be compulsory. It's currently about stupid crap like how does this century old book relate to the concept of belonging etc. or what techniques convey so and so. Why does this matter? And why is that compulsory?

It's as if whoever made English compulsory had the mindset of thinking that the course was about how to write correctly and be able to communicate their ideas effectively. However that's not what the course focuses on. It focuses on trying to understand weird figurative concepts.
THIS IS WHAT I AM TRYING TO SAY! THANKYOU!!! THANKYOU!!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top