gerhard said:because they were DEFENDING their country against the INVADERS which is the USWhy is it that so many individuals on here, in the media and on the left in the political sphere are so eager to defend Iraqi terrorists, Saddam Hussein (and his henchmen) and the insurgents that cause 80% of the deaths that have occurred since the conflict began?
[/quote
Why is it that so many individuals on here, in the media and on the right in the political sphere are so eager to set up a false dichotomy, whereby criticising western policy is equated with defending terrorists and dictators?
no. the republican party stands for corruption and satisfying Cheney's oil greedy friends in Texas. "no more ties with halliburton" MY ASS.darek_arsenal said:No. The Republic party are for those with values. For those who are anti-isolationistic. For those who want to destroy terrorism. Maybe your the one who is ignorant...bitch?
Sorry, the ideas are mine, the profanity is from my brother.frog12986 said:No offence, but I don't really want to be associated with you.. No need to resort to offensive language if you can communicate your point..
Yeah almost as good as calling all Republicans "ignorant rednecks".secondly, calling me a bitch is an awesome way to get your point across.
Watch out, I seem to recall katietheskatie was winning the "who would win in a fight?" poll !!Captain Gh3y said:Yeah almost as good as calling all Republicans "ignorant rednecks".
If they are defending their country why did they kill their own people in hundreds everyday? Is that a new strategy to defend ones own country? massacring their fellow Iraqis, their fellow muslims and you sound very happy about it360flip said:because they were DEFENDING their country against the INVADERS which is the US
Typical coward libtard who prefer submission instead of fighting. Fact, there has not been any terrorists attack since 9/11 in USA, its pretty succesful, No attack in Australia despite numerous attempts by muslim terrorists, thanks to australian intelligence and police forces. Even if Democrats won the congressional elections, they are no friend of terrorists and muslims as you may wish. They equally hate you just like the republicans!onebytwo said:guess what darek you cant defeat terrorism! how the hell is some stupid ass loser like bush going to prevent some angry fool from killing, assanssinating, murdering someone for a political cause?....you cant stop it you knit wit.
Republicans are going down....not going to be a happy last 2 years for bushy, when he has no more control over congress
er....washington sniper?Aryanbeauty said:If they are defending their country why did they kill their own people in hundreds everyday? Is that a new strategy to defend ones own country? massacring their fellow Iraqis, their fellow muslims and you sound very happy about it
Typical coward libtard who prefer submission instead of fighting. Fact, there has not been any terrorists attack since 9/11 in USA, its pretty succesful, No attack in Australia despite numerous attempts by muslim terrorists, thanks to australian intelligence and police forces. Even if Democrats won the congressional elections, they are no friend of terrorists and muslims as you may wish. They equally hate you just like the republicans!
Britain is not USA and not ruled by george Bush nor republican. The fact that they arrested close to 50 terror suspects during the past 5 years shows they are successful.onebytwo said:you didnt mention britian..you never mention britain
of course they are not the same country....but they share almost identical foreign policy. anybody can arrest any suspect...thats not the problem..the problem is preventing incidents like 7/7...i guess that was a success to?Aryanbeauty said:Britain is not USA and not ruled by george Bush nor republican. The fact that they arrested close to 50 terror suspects during the past 5 years shows they are successful.
And what do you suggest to combat terrorism? No we will not submit to muslims, USA, Britain , Israel or Australia will NOT submit to your saint Osama Bin Laden. Keep dreaming.
Aryanbeauty are you applying (rather, auditioning) for the U.S. propaganda department?Aryanbeauty said:And what do you suggest to combat terrorism? No we will not submit to muslims, USA, Britain , Israel or Australia will NOT submit to your saint Osama Bin Laden. Keep dreaming.
Actually he made the decision any reasonable leader would have made in his place, given the intelligence presented by the CIA to various branches of the US government (and several foreign governments, including our own). He said he wouldn't take chances after 9/11, and guess what, he kept his word.katietheskatie said:not necessarily genocide, but invading a country based on feeding absolute bullshit to the people of his country and the rest of the world?
WTF?!going against the wishes of the united nations?
This applied to a relitively small collective of countries like Iran, Iraq and so forth, it was never meant as a plurality statement.pressuring other countries to join him by saying that either you're with the united states or you're a terrorist?
Whatever the case, Iraq is now a sponge for alot of the islamic terrorism in the region, last time I checked thats not a bad thing, it just makes them easier to kill.realising there were no weapons of mass destruction and then conveniently changing his reason to invading for 'liberating the iraqi people'?
The rights of states are directly proportional to the amount of guns they posses.yeah, george bush totally had the right to invade iraq. awesome.
The Republican Party attracts more votes from people that have university qualifications and a job, as opposed to the stoned hippie slackers, feminists who just bitch all day.the republican party is for ignorant rednecks. are you an ignorant redneck, buddy?
like who ? osama bin laden isnt iraqi, the 9/11 hijackers were not iraqi (correct me if im wrong) the britain bombers+would be bombers were not iraqi.....bshoc said:Whatever the case, Iraq is now a sponge for alot of the islamic terrorism in the region, last time I checked thats not a bad thing, it just makes them easier to kill.
i never knew this ? how do you* Approximately half of the muslim world supports Bin Laden and various like movements
Well firstly the term "Iraqi" actually means very little, even to the people you call "Iraqis," there isnt much in the way of the concept of nation in the muslim world outside Palestine and Lebanon, the first priority is to family or clan, then to "Ummah" or muslims/fellow believers/religion as a whole.lexie85 said:like who ? osama bin laden isnt iraqi, the 9/11 hijackers were not iraqi (correct me if im wrong) the britain bombers+would be bombers were not iraqi.....
these are the ones we should be worried about, not a bunch of iraqi who most probably would never leave their village
Because I care to inform myselfi never knew this ? how do you
bshoc said:* Approximately half of the muslim world supports Bin Laden and various like movements, thats not even counting those who dont support Bin Laden but harbor ill will towards non-muslim peoples. Thus from a logical perspective, our concern over Iraqi "civilian" deaths should be minimal relative to broader goals.
geez you should become aryanbeauty's assistant in the U.S. Propaganda Department. This is worse than the crap that Stalin used to come up with.bshoc said:Al-Queda did declare Iraq to be the most important front in the "struggle against the infidels," I mean there was and still is a whole organisation called "Al-Queda in Iraq," not to mention many of the groups present on our terror watch lists. It's too simplistic to say "bin Laden isn't an Iraqi" when Al-Queda and much of the muslim world cares little for national barriers anyway, you cant just be content with destroying the products, you have to go after the factory as well.
hahaha wtf is this. Man china is propping up the U.S. economy. Without Chinese loans the U.S. economy is screwed.bshoc said:* The US, to the disappointment of the foam-at-the-mouth leftists on this board is far from decline or even stagnation, infact next year their defence spending will be greater than every other country combined. The US economy is the strongest it has ever been likewise.
bshoc said:Well firstly the term "Iraqi" actually means very little, even to the people you call "Iraqis," there isnt much in the way of the concept of nation in the muslim world outside Palestine and Lebanon, the first priority is to family or clan, then to "Ummah" or muslims/fellow believers/religion as a whole.
Al-Queda did declare Iraq to be the most important front in the "struggle against the infidels," I mean there was and still is a whole organisation called "Al-Queda in Iraq," not to mention many of the groups present on our terror watch lists. It's too simplistic to say "bin Laden isn't an Iraqi" when Al-Queda and much of the muslim world cares little for national barriers anyway, you cant just be content with destroying the products, you have to go after the factory as well. [/qoute]
first it started with a person - bin laden
then an organisation - alqeda
then a country - iraq
now your saying the whole muslim/arab world
whats next, the human race?
Rather than address your rant, pay attention to how I phrase my statements, I personally don't think Iraq was the right thing to do, infact Bush stuffed up in this decision, majorly, then again so did all the people who are so blantantly anti-Bush and anti-war today, why? Because they were looking at the same intelligence, at least Bush has the spine to admit it.turtleface said:-insert classic leftist anti-war argument here-
Compare the power of the EU, a larger economic power, with the power of the US, a far greater military power and slighly smaller economically, now which one is more powerful today?hahaha wtf is this. Man china is propping up the U.S. economy. Without Chinese loans the U.S. economy is screwed.
YesGetting back to the facts, 3 years ago, Saddam was captured a few months before U.S. elections right in the midst of a fierce Democrat campaign. Coincidence? Maybe Yes. Now, Saddam is sentenced 2 days before U.S. Mid terms. Coincidence?