Stefano
Sexiest Member
I didn't say Student X was me. I actually think I scored somewhere closer to 70, maybe high 60's.blackfriday said:60/120 will getcha 82-83/100, which in turn will scale to about 87-88/100 for uai calculation.
Thanks though!
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
I didn't say Student X was me. I actually think I scored somewhere closer to 70, maybe high 60's.blackfriday said:60/120 will getcha 82-83/100, which in turn will scale to about 87-88/100 for uai calculation.
well, that is put up against the ranks of your HSC, i.e. the mark for 1st in HSC = the mark for 1st in school, and same for last, and sometimes middle, and the rest of the class is arranged in the same ratios around the max, median, minxiaojia said:how about the school rank?
you dont put your raw marks in , you put your final hsc mark in the sam moderator. the rite hand side is the scaled uai contributiondesperate cat said:i don't understand.
ppl say 80 raw marks would get u a 90+, but i check the Sam moderator, 80 raw mark can only get about 87 or 88...
Hmm, I still don't get this. What is "distribution of scaled marks?" So if all the 4u people bomb out on Thursday, how does that affect the scaling? For both 3u and 4u.Lazarus said:That's how scaling for all extension courses is performed.
Ext 1 distribution of scaled marks = scaled marks gained by Ext 1 students on 2U paper
Ext 2 distribution of scaled marks = scaled marks gained by Ext 2 students on Ext 1 paper
The exception is English Extension 2, where the distribution of marks is shaped to be the distribution of marks gained by the Extension 2 candidature on the Advanced paper, rather than on the Extension 1 paper.
you should get scaled to 80 and maybe 85 for uaiDn0myat said:Omg by checking my answer's to Terry Hills soln, i only scored a 58/120
i jst want to get scaled to 80, will i get scaled to 80? PLZ BOS scale me to 80
The words "distribution of scaled marks" refer to all the scaled marks awarded to the candidature (as distinct from a mark awarded to an individual student).Dumsum said:Hmm, I still don't get this. What is "distribution of scaled marks?" So if all the 4u people bomb out on Thursday, how does that affect the scaling? For both 3u and 4u.
that was the old system it's more complex now...Kiev said:Ok...so where does the fact we are given the marks of the person who achieves the external ranking of our internal ranking . eg. If you're ranked 27th in the course after the trials (based on all the assessments) you'll get the 27th best HSC mark from your school cohort? Does that even happen?
Yes, it does, but not exactly as you described.Kiev said:Ok...so where does the fact we are given the marks of the person who achieves the external ranking of our internal ranking . eg. If you're ranked 27th in the course after the trials (based on all the assessments) you'll get the 27th best HSC mark from your school cohort? Does that even happen?
i don't think that the cut off for 03 was 47/120 for e4. maybe e3? because isnt the avg normally around 60ish, and 03 being hard paper, maybe avg will be 50ish/120?~ ReNcH ~ said:I'm quite sure now than the Band E4 cut-off for 2003 was between 40 and 47/120 and given that it was a fairly difficult paper, I'd be inclined to say that the 2005 cut-off will lie in the vicinity of 60-70/120...that's if BOS agrees with me in the belief that this year's paper was more difficult than last year's.
I don't have enough data to determine all the band cut-offs. But in this case, all I need is one piece of data to calculate the E4 cut-off. Since there can only be one straight line drawn between two points* (these being the upper end-point of 100% and the other being Keypad's mark), then it's possible to extrapolate an estimate for the E4 cut-off.blackfriday said:so you're telling me you only need one piece of data in order to determine all the band cut-offs. i know that you said that all the marks are linearly interpolated between the band cut-offs but wouldnt it be reasonable to question the accuracy of data based on just one piece of evidence? im not saying that you're off the pace, im just wondering what would happen if you had lets say three raw mark/aligned mark comparsions.
