cuendillar
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2006
- Messages
- 15
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
Ok guys and girls,
do you prefer hot but dull, or fun but hard-on-the eyes?
do you prefer hot but dull, or fun but hard-on-the eyes?
having an option inbetween would make the choice too easy.ur_inner_child said:I'd date the one in the middle of the extremes.
I'm sorry but looks and personality both matter...
If I had to choose, well theres a problem, cuz the fun but hard on the eyes will be my friend and thats all, and the hot but dull is someone I won't associate with really, maybe less of a friend than the ugly guy.
"Hot but dull" and "Hot but no brains" I feel are two different people by the way. A hot guy with no brains can be outrageous fun.
the bimbo is fun just to have as a tag along, and of course they'd drive you up the wall, but there are so many beautiful girls out there that aren't willing to show their true beauty unless they want to. They're not out to impress until they want to, and thats a quality within itself. I think just a sweet girl who's down to earth, dresses sexy and to stun only for someone really deserving would be awesome.cuendillar said:having an option inbetween would make the choice too easy.
From A guys perspective, a girl that is stunning but dull, will most likely have no brains... the bimbo type. They can amuse me for a short time, but then drive me nuts.