I thought the question was alright, although the quote didn't really fit all that well. Not complaining though.
I just talked about how Gibbon, Runciman and Jones said the Crusades were a way for the Church to expand their power/influence, etc. and contrasted this with how Madden and Riley-Smith believe they were defensive wars. I disagreed with the source/question a bit though - I said that what those who were anti-Crusades said isn't 'accepted', and so the quote doesn't apply all that well.
Dunno if it made sense though :-/. And I only wrote about 9 pages. Damn.