Captain Gh3y
Rhinorhondothackasaurus
Re: The Official A-League Thread.
Team B has done the double
Team A has not
Team B has done the double
Team A has not
ROFL. What is the point of an exaggerated scenario? From finishing in the finals for three years to 30 years.blakegman said:Team A has 1 title and finishes in the finals every year for 30 years
Team b has 1 title and has only finished in the finals once when they won it.
Exaggerated scenario but who is the more successful team
Team A
Yup pretty much how i see it.blue_chameleon said:Furthering that blake, a lot consider that consistency contributes a lot to success. The way the A-Leagues finals are structured, all you need to do is be the best team on the day.
I dont think any club has been hugely successful this early into the life of the league. But thats my opinion being based on success being more than just winning the trophy.
EDIT: I'll just add everything said in the above post.
:rofl:blakegman said:success equals more then trophies
on the last page i already listed some things which are important to young a-league clubssk1001 said:What else matters to a succesfull club?
I'l guarantee you that a lot of clubs aren't building their plans for the clubs success solely around winning a trophy at the end of the year.sk1001 said::rofl:
Getting close but failing at the last hurdle = success?
TROPHIES DEFINE A SUCCESSFUL CLUB.
What is the difference between Manchester United and Wycombe Wanderers?
9 Premier League titles
11 FA Cups
2 European Cups
What else matters to a succesfull club?
33 thousand dickhead. it's called biggest crowd of the season.Captain Gh3y said:like crowd numbers?
who needs it when you have uncle lowyfinancial viability?
nnoe of them were good enough for SFCnot going through 1000 coaches?
oops
ManU finishes in the top 4, Wanderers don't.sk1001 said:What is the difference between Manchester United and Wycombe Wanderers?
please do explain to me how newcastle and/or CCM are more successful than SFC, on or off the pitch.sk1001 said:Success on the field is the catalyst for success off the field. When a team is winning, people will come to the game, people will buy merchandise...
We've seen it with Melbourne, we've seen it with Newcastle, we've seen it with the Central Coast.
TROPHIES = SUCCESS. end of.
You can say SFS is successful, but as successful as they should be?veridis said:please do explain to me how newcastle and/or CCM are more successful than SFC, on or off the pitch.
Its not the team competing against teams in other codes, its the codes themself. And there seems to be a lot of talk in all the major codes with the AFL, A-League, Union, and League have all been spruiking their expansion plans lately. Whether much of this will eventuate remains to be seen.blakegman said:Sydney FC competes with a lot more other professional sporting teams who had established themselves long before the A-League.
Who do CCM compete against ?