i just dont understand how 14 of 25 students could get full marks in the essay, doesnt that defeat the purpose of internal assesment - i.e. determining a ranking of students from best to worst....
our school is generally one of the top in the state in history, and we had two marks in the 30s, when the project was out of 40, and the rest in the 20s. what is the point of having 14 marks the same, unless they were of exactly equal quality, and as perfect as a colloege student can get, bearing in mind we had 14 months to complete this. im not bitter or anything, as it makes no difference at all to our HSC mark, as its is all moderated on the exam, im just wondering at the motivation of the teachers to have almost no diverisity in marks. oh well....
by the way, it seems our teacher didnt enter any of us in this competition, i guess he didnt know about it....(or is too lazy...)