-
Finished your HSC? Check out our University Discussion, Non-School forums or help out next year's HSC students! -
YOU can help the next generation of students in the community! Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
The Official VB One Day Tri-Series Thread (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Lhyviathan
- Start date
Not-That-Bright
Andrew Quah
umm they did get hammed batting wise.... australia got hammered too, but they got hammered more.
215 or whatever it was they ended up on... really isn't that much.
215 or whatever it was they ended up on... really isn't that much.
Pace Setter
Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2004
- Messages
- 216
Hammered as in "lost by a large margin," which wasn't really the case today
Not-That-Bright
Andrew Quah
no i feel that both teams batting was hammered by the other teams bowling....Pace Setter said:
Pace Setter
Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2004
- Messages
- 216
Compared with modern-day ODI scoring rates, yes. The point I raised originally, was that, compared to India last year (who were hammered on the overall scorecard), and England the year before, Pakistan made a decent game of it-they were in with some sort of chance for the most part. The contrast here with scorecards of the last two years at the ground (in the final) is (a bit) startling.
matt#1
...
It is a bit startling, but it is also good for the game in my opinion. There is nothing wrong with a bit of healthy competition once in a while.Pace Setter said:
IamaFloorMat
Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2005
- Messages
- 127
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
lol , well that was Pakistan's opportunity
237 is nothing really these days...
they seem to have a big problem with surviving teh first 15 overs
237 is nothing really these days...
they seem to have a big problem with surviving teh first 15 overs
NZ were just here. Is the chapell-hadlee series an annual thing?
next world cup is 2007 i think australia is gonna be in trouble. gilly will be 35 no offence to haddin but he is not nearly as good as gilly. McGrath is getting old now except for clarke i think the team will all be between 31-36, and i dont think there are that many obvious replacements coming through
next world cup is 2007 i think australia is gonna be in trouble. gilly will be 35 no offence to haddin but he is not nearly as good as gilly. McGrath is getting old now except for clarke i think the team will all be between 31-36, and i dont think there are that many obvious replacements coming through
Not-That-Bright
Andrew Quah
ummm... yes there are, the australian team will be in better shape in 2007 than most teams.
If you have cable tv you will see Aus vs New Zealand this month, i think England may be coming down too. The first ever Twenty20 international match will be played between NZ and Aus also! I cant wait.Supra said:
angelduck
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2004
- Messages
- 1,878
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2004
they aren't showing them on 9? That really sux, i dont wanna pay to watch tv dammit!
yeh i dont have foxtel i used to but parents took it off coz no one watched it, and the india aus series in india back in 2001 had just finished at that time...my friend has foxtel and i think most bars and shit wud have foxtel so it wudnt b bad watching it ova there
max
That which u feel becomes
slip said:
Expect an exodus-type retirement run AFTER the 2007 WC. The cup should still be ours. Most players are setting the cup as their goal.
I just hope the next generation are ready to be thrusted into the side, cause there'll be quite a few.
Seraph
Now You've done it.......
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2003
- Messages
- 897
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
Lol pakistan is gone
Afridi's wicket looked a bit suss to me and to tell u the truth i thought the benefit of the doubt always goes to the batsman in situations like this????
think that was a bit of a bad call...
Afridi's wicket looked a bit suss to me and to tell u the truth i thought the benefit of the doubt always goes to the batsman in situations like this????
think that was a bit of a bad call...