bruh.
you know there are actually kids that have grinded for the HSC exams and expect to pop off externals to get into med/law/etc.. What if estimating their marks render them incapable of getting into these courses despite grinding to pop off in the external exams?
To the vast majority claimed by Sydney Morning Herald to not want HSC exams, I reckon if given a choice, many would choose not to take externals in normal circumstances.
But to the minority that depend on .5 to determine their course entry, especially the ones that are under as predicted by internals, NEED externals.
For the majority, it's a matter of preference. For the minority, it's MANDATORY.
You could theoretically give students a +- range for entering universities. But good luck dealing with an extra 1000 applicants with the stats for a required course.
tldr
I don't think they can cancel HSC.
If they do,
massive bruh moment.
you know there are actually kids that have grinded for the HSC exams and expect to pop off externals to get into med/law/etc.. What if estimating their marks render them incapable of getting into these courses despite grinding to pop off in the external exams?
To the vast majority claimed by Sydney Morning Herald to not want HSC exams, I reckon if given a choice, many would choose not to take externals in normal circumstances.
But to the minority that depend on .5 to determine their course entry, especially the ones that are under as predicted by internals, NEED externals.
For the majority, it's a matter of preference. For the minority, it's MANDATORY.
You could theoretically give students a +- range for entering universities. But good luck dealing with an extra 1000 applicants with the stats for a required course.
tldr
I don't think they can cancel HSC.
If they do,
massive bruh moment.
Last edited: