L
LaraB
Guest
as i said before... i'll repeat it again.....wikiwiki said:Some small group decides what is important and what is not: they analyse the data and form policy.
By the way: weren't you saying that the majority didn't always know what is best..
Unless you are somehow suggesting that the entire populace runs the student union (is that the smell of communism...?)
majority doesn't always know what is right but that doesn't necessarily mean individuals do and vice versa.
in cases like this individual benefit cannot be stated to unequivocally validate a policy since the greater populace will be impacted by it and individuals actions impact upon each other
duh obviously a small gropu analyses the data, but if 100% of people say they thinkk we should have ... i dunno.. a union funded footy team, then they'll do it and likewise is 100% say we should get rid of funding for the queer association they would
obviously data is interpreted but i'ts much more likely to achieve a beneficial response if a group are interpreting responses from veryone than if everyone just does what they want.... yes data may be interpreted but if questions are asked clearly such as "do you want service x" then they can't interpret it to suit themselves because the intention is clear.
similarly, if they find that say, the pass rate of students falls due to i du nno... a lack of union representation in serious matters with uni admin, this statistical finding will lead to a conclusion that that particular aspect of the policy is not beneficial for the greater populace as although not everyone is failing, if 75% for example are failing, the negative rep etc will impact on the others so it's bad for everyone.