Aerath
Retired
- Joined
- May 10, 2007
- Messages
- 10,169
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
Prove it. Sorry, couldn't help it.And jm, shame on you, pulling the same cards you did in that maths thread
Just preparing you for what he's undoubtedly gonna say.
Prove it. Sorry, couldn't help it.And jm, shame on you, pulling the same cards you did in that maths thread
LOLProve it. Sorry, couldn't help it.
Just preparing you for what he's undoubtedly gonna say.
ie...?And jm, shame on you, pulling the same cards you did in that maths thread...
Because I _always_ make mistakes when I use a calculator and I'm slow at using one. It's all about personal preference.Well, if you can go without a calculator, then go ahead. But if makes no sense what so ever to me, as to why you'd disregard a calculator for some stuff (eg. 45 degree angles, etc) but use it for other (eg, 33 degree angle)...While 45 is an exact value, would it not be easier to just use a calculator for both?
You just had to go off topic didn't you? So I guess you're going to be always carrying around a calculator (or a computer) when you go, for cases like, say shopping and you need to find out how much your groceries add up to and you only have a certain amount of money?Additionally, your point about people being too dependant on calculators is stupid, to say the least. Maths isn't about "calculations"...computers can do calculations...maths is about ideas, theories and concepts...
Why don't you lead by example?So really...I guess what i'm trying to say is, shut the fuck up, cause no one gives a shit.
I assume you just finished? just like mela la la la la la la
why cant we be friends
why cant we be friends
why cant we be friends
why cant we be friendssssssssssss
yeah, eh hahaa
why cant we be friends
why cant we be friends
why cant we be friends
why cant we be friendssssssssss
heeheeheee woo
why cant we be friends
why cant we be friends
why cant we be friends
why cant we be friendssssssssssssss
Win.ie...?
hahaha that is so so funny. Old predictable Jm.Win.
If your saying that he was the reason that the Physics course was turned into a History course, please fist him up his ass for me.He actually is... He got alot of the (ie. content) stuff cut out of the course during the proposals for a new course before 2001 as he knew someone quite high up in the BOS back then.
When the course was first proposed there was so much content, so much that in 2001 and 2002 (even after cutting doing the initial proposal), after the course was introduced, they cut stuff out like Van Allen Belt stuff.If your saying that he was the reason that the Physics course was turned into a History course, please fist him up his ass for me.
And who would that Math teacher be?Does your "high level BOS contact physics teacher extraordinaire" talk to your 'high level BOS contact maths teacher extraordinaire" whom you introduced in that maths thread?
Additionally, since you are obviously going to rebut I will mention that you, in said thread, mentioned his degree, level of teaching, the fact that he has a solution but, for some reason you can't share it and made several condescending comments about other peoples teachers/education.lolokay, I think that my teacher who has taught Mathematics some 30 years would know what he's doing. As I said before, not all probability can be solved by applying simple formulas!
Oh, and how mature of you to call me arrogant I think there's a pot calling the kettle black here =D
haha reading from the comment, your 'right' again jm, just another example of his arrogance and unfathomably shit posts. You're wrong everytime, including this post.Maths*, we say "Maths" in Australia...
anyway:
Additionally, since you are obviously going to rebut I will mention that you, in said thread, mentioned his degree, level of teaching, the fact that he has a solution but, for some reason you can't share it and made several condescending comments about other peoples teachers/education.
Q.E.fucking.D
You could refer to the thread next time...Additionally, since you are obviously going to rebut I will mention that you, in said thread
That was only because you said that he had a BA.mentioned his degree, level of teaching
Yes I have a solution, but I didn't say the latter.the fact that he has a solution but, for some reason you can't share it
No I didn't.and made several condescending comments about other peoples teachers/education.
BTW, have you yet found out who I am/who bumped into your car?haha reading from the comment, your 'right' again jm, just another example of his arrogance and unfathomably shit posts. You're wrong everytime, including this post.
1) I was referring to another thread to back up my ideas...which is basically the foundation of every court case, English essay and every logical argument.You know, I find it really funny that you have to now (after exhausting all other avenues) refer to other threads in your attempts to put dirt on me.
Not only what you have just mentioned have no relevance to the initial argument (which has pretty much ended now), but it has no point.
That was only because you said that he had a BA.
Yes I have a solution, but I didn't say the latter.
FYI, the main reason I didn't post it up was because it was handwritten, and it wasn't just plain algebraic notation. And so I couldn't type it up. And I don't have a scanner at home (that is readily accessible).
Kindly quit with the HSC English BS.1) I was referring to another thread to back up my ideas...which is basically the foundation of every court case, English essay and every logical argument.
2) The argument is that you are a condescending douchebag who considers himself superior to others, both in knowledge and in schooling. I am merely showing everyone that you are, perhaps, a run of the mill student with megalomaniac attitudes.
He might. But the main reason was that I didn't have a scanner that I could readily access at home.3) You implied that your teacher would get angry if you shared it, or some shit like that.
What? You're going on about English, and yet you cannot express yourself clearly?Point is, by arguing with me, you are fulfilling the purpose of me arguing with you, that is, to show everyone you, somewhat, pathetic temperament and justification.
lol i have to admit that is good, explain to me where the car was, what i would have been doing at this venue, what street it was in, this day had was significant, how?BTW, have you yet found out who I am/who bumped into your car?