We need a much greater emphasis on science in schools? (1 Viewer)

someth1ng

Retired Nov '14
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
5,558
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2021
And I can assure you as someone who works in the profession, that there is never enough time.
There will never seem to be enough time - that's nothing special or new. It doesn't mean you can't fit in more and it's not an excuse to not fit in what is needed.
 

scuba_steve2121

On The Road To Serfdom
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
1,343
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
There will never seem to be enough time - that's nothing special or new. It doesn't mean you can't fit in more and it's not an excuse to not fit in what is needed.
It's like talking to a brick wall
 

isildurrrr1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
1,756
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
somehow all those asian kids have enough time.
 

JohnMaximus

shepherd of the people
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Messages
585
Location
Elysium
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
There needs to be a greater emphasis on science during k-6 stages.

You could probably teach a 5 year old some basic physics (moving about topic: things fall, they move when they are pushed, they don't move if you don't push them...). They learn Darwin's evolution from pokemon anyway, so that shouldn't be an issue.
 

isildurrrr1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
1,756
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
There needs to be a greater emphasis on science during k-6 stages.

You could probably teach a 5 year old some basic physics (moving about topic: things fall, they move when they are pushed, they don't move if you don't push them...). They learn Darwin's evolution from pokemon anyway, so that shouldn't be an issue.
my primary school banned pokemon cards because it promoted evolution. and they also banned harry potter books because it promoted witchcraft. GG seventh day adventists. fucking morons. also wasnt there a report that pokemon cards were improving literacy or some shit back in the day.
 

flashyGoldFish

Active Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2013
Messages
465
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
How can pokemon promote evolution when pokemon 'evolution' is so scientifically wrong?
 

Absolutezero

real human bean
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
15,082
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
my primary school banned pokemon cards because it promoted evolution. and they also banned harry potter books because it promoted witchcraft. GG seventh day adventists. fucking morons. also wasnt there a report that pokemon cards were improving literacy or some shit back in the day.
They're certainly weren't improving card game skills, because nobody had any idea how to actually play.
 

AB940

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2012
Messages
121
Gender
Female
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2015
There needs to be a greater emphasis on science during k-6 stages.

You could probably teach a 5 year old some basic physics (moving about topic: things fall, they move when they are pushed, they don't move if you don't push them...). They learn Darwin's evolution from pokemon anyway, so that shouldn't be an issue.
I was watching a documentary about science education ages ago and a primary school teacher was conducting an experiment of teaching the concept of atoms (and protons, neutrons and electrons) to grade 3 students and they were understanding it fine. The younger you learn something like this the more intuitive it becomes so I think starting with basic concepts would definitely be a good thing.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top