Which Australian Prime Minister is better: Gough Whitlam or Julia Gillard? (1 Viewer)

Which Australian Prime Minister is better: Gough Whitlam or Julia Gillard?


  • Total voters
    32

Mdzabakly

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2012
Messages
458
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Dude, ...
Gough whitlam: * passed countless reforms
* was a revolutionary
*began the push for ab/ts islander land rights ( and own human rights)
* was taken down by liberal scum through a horrible loophole in the legislative system.
* brought in medicare

Julia gillard: * lied about her want to be leader, then brutally assasinated her pm.
* has brought the labor down in polls so far, that we may only aquire 30 seats at the most ( kim beazly)
* introduced a tax which she said she wouldnt ( im pro CT, however this isnt the way it should have came in)


you decide.
 

soloooooo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
3,311
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Rudd > Donkey > Gillard

If it was a poll between Gillard and a monkey, the monkey would win.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
uhmmm

Whitlam > keating> rudd> gillard
I dont get the Keating fetish among leftists, he was an economic rationalist through and through. My post Mcmahon Prime Ministers rank as Whitlam, Fraser, Rudd, Hawke, Keating, Gillard, Howard.
 

Azure

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
5,681
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I dont get the Keating fetish among leftists, he was an economic rationalist through and through. My post Mcmahon Prime Ministers rank as Whitlam, Fraser, Rudd, Hawke, Keating, Gillard, Howard.
Not much love for old Johnny Howard eh?
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Not much love for old Johnny Howard eh?
Children attempting suicide behind razor wire and he and his ministers strutted around wearing the fact like some sort of badge of honour, he can never redeem himself
 

townie

Premium Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2004
Messages
9,646
Location
Gladesville
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Uni Grad
2009
I dont get the Keating fetish among leftists, he was an economic rationalist through and through. My post Mcmahon Prime Ministers rank as Whitlam, Fraser, Rudd, Hawke, Keating, Gillard, Howard.
I think the love for Keating is more about the man than the policies, you can't deny he was a character.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
I think the love for Keating is more about the man than the policies, you can't deny he was a character.
That may be true outside of the of the tent, but among Labor types he is enormously revered as some sort of "keeper of the leftie flame" more so than Gough, Hawke or Kevin combined it seems sometimes.
 

townie

Premium Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2004
Messages
9,646
Location
Gladesville
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Uni Grad
2009
That may be true outside of the of the tent, but among Labor types he is enormously revered as some sort of "keeper of the leftie flame" more so than Gough, Hawke or Kevin combined it seems sometimes.
I'd hardly call Kevin a leftie, left-leaning on some issues at best
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
I'd hardly call Kevin a leftie, left-leaning on some issues at best
I'd say he's the leftest Prime Minister since Whitlam, enormous investment in education, great commitment to reconciliation, abolished temporary protection visas, pro China, pro multiculturalism, removed forty pieces of LBGT discriminatory legislation, supports carbon pricing, supports super profits tax, spearheaded communications infrastructure through the national broadband network. That he presents himself as a nerdy, moderate, mild chap shouldn't distract from his largely socialist agenda.
 

townie

Premium Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2004
Messages
9,646
Location
Gladesville
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Uni Grad
2009
I'd say he's the leftest Prime Minister since Whitlam, enormous investment in education, great commitment to reconciliation, abolished temporary protection visas, pro China, pro multiculturalism, removed forty pieces of LBGT discriminatory legislation, supports carbon pricing, supports super profits tax, spearheaded communications infrastructure through the national broadband network. That he presents himself as a nerdy, moderate, mild chap shouldn't distract from his largely socialist agenda.
Most of your points are things that are true of any labor PM and really don't define him as any more "leftie" than the rest - they merely define him as a labor politician.

He dropped carbon pricing as soon as it wasn't popular.

He didn't support same sex marriage (and anybody that doesn't can't claim to be a leftie).

And frankly a lot of what he did or didn't do was driven more by how they would play out politically rather than any genuine belief in them.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Most of your points are things that are true of any labor PM and really don't define him as any more "leftie" than the rest - they merely define him as a labor politician.

He dropped carbon pricing as soon as it wasn't popular.

He didn't support same sex marriage (and anybody that doesn't can't claim to be a leftie).

And frankly a lot of what he did or didn't do was driven more by how they would play out politically rather than any genuine belief in them.
I disagree with a lot of that, Rudd's shelving of the ETS has well and truly been revealed as largely the doing of Gillard, Swan and Arbib now, it seems very clear that he wanted that policy implemented whereas she did not. Keating as PM voted down a bill introduced by Hewson to have an ETS and I think it's very clear were it not for the Greens Gillard would never have implemented a carbon price so I would say carbon pricing is not the normal stand point for Labor PM's.

Likewise Mark Latham, Kim Beazley and Julia Gillard all have supported smallish immigration intakes and offshore processing of asylum seekers, whilst Keating introduced mandatory detention. I would argue Rudd is the only PM since Fraser to move towards a more compassionate stance on refugees and asylum seekers.

No Labor leader living or otherwise has ever supported gay marriage, and it is rumoured Rudd will vote for it in the conscience vote.

I also reject that Rudd "played politics" more than other Labor Prime Ministers, except Whitlam of course. The most classic example of playing politics from a Labor PM must surely be Keating, who supported a value added tax, launching a smearing scare campaign against Hewson for promising to introduce just that.
 

townie

Premium Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2004
Messages
9,646
Location
Gladesville
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Uni Grad
2009
I disagree with a lot of that, Rudd's shelving of the ETS has well and truly been revealed as largely the doing of Gillard, Swan and Arbib now, it seems very clear that he wanted that policy implemented whereas she did not.
And if he truly believed in it he would have stuck to his guns. I also dispute your " well and truly" statement. Laurie Oaks is only one man with one source.

No Labor leader living or otherwise has ever supported gay marriage, and it is rumoured Rudd will vote for it in the conscience vote.
That doesn't change the fact he could have easily implemented it in government but publicly spoke against it. I'm also convinced that any vote in favour is only to gain the support of his colleagues rather than any genuine belief in it.

QUOTE=Lentern;5992897
I also reject that Rudd "played politics" more than other Labor Prime Ministers, except Whitlam of course. The most classic example of playing politics from a Labor PM must surely be Keating, who supported a value added tax, launching a smearing scare campaign against Hewson for promising to introduce just that.[/quote]

Rudd over promised and under delivered - apart from Fair Work (which any labor would do), immigration and NBN I can't think of any major reforms (not just throwing money at things) that he saw through to completion. Gillard on the other hand has at least actually delivered on reforms.

Rudd wasn't even part of the left faction.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
And if he truly believed in it he would have stuck to his guns. I also dispute your " well and truly" statement. Laurie Oaks is only one man with one source.
Lenore Taylor? You seem to also be ignoring the enormous efforts Rudd went to, infinitely greater than any other Australian politician, to bring together a global agreement at Copenhagen. You also seem to be basing your argument on this political fiction that Rudd could have magically rammed it through the senate and gotten his way.


That doesn't change the fact he could have easily implemented it in government but publicly spoke against it. I'm also convinced that any vote in favour is only to gain the support of his colleagues rather than any genuine belief in it.
Um, no he could not have easily implemented it, the Labor Parties national platform was resolutely against it when he came to the leadership in 2006, changing it would have been very difficult indeed. And on basis of your cynicism about his voting motives I would argue you're predisposed to think cynically of him and there is little chance of a constructive dialogue.


Rudd over promised and under delivered - apart from Fair Work (which any labor would do), immigration and NBN I can't think of any major reforms (not just throwing money at things)
that he saw through to completion
. Gillard on the other hand has at least actually delivered on reforms.
Don't give me that crap line of tories since kingdom come that "oh he just through money at the problem" go down to hospitals, schools etc and find a NUM or a principal that tells you that funding is an enormous part of the problem. And name one reform Gillard has seen through to completion since Rudd left office? The closest I see her coming is the carbon pricing which is still three years off completion.


Rudd wasn't even part of the left faction
Which means what exactly? No Labor leader since Evatt has been. Gillard doesn't either, she is not part of the socialist left faction she is part of a small subfaction called the Ferguson left which is way more closely aligned with the a bunch of renegades from the right faction than it is with the major lefties. They are very trade union/blue collar worker oriented, not socially progressive the Ferguson left.

But this seems pointless, basically anything he does that you agree with you say "he was just playing politics" and anything you disagree with you say "huh! this is the real Rudd, isn't he awful."
 
Last edited:

Rafy

Retired
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
10,719
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Uni Grad
2008
Children attempting suicide behind razor wire and he and his ministers strutted around wearing the fact like some sort of badge of honour, he can never redeem himself
And now you have Gillard trying to out-Howard the coalition on asylum seeker policy. Oh how far the ALP have fallen.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top