Your down 2-0, philphie. Hand in your resignation letter.I did mention bonus points schemes several pages back![]()
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
Your down 2-0, philphie. Hand in your resignation letter.I did mention bonus points schemes several pages back![]()
i'm not going down that easily. new proposition: regulating all alternative entry schemes into one universal schemeYour down 2-0, philphie. Hand in your resignation letter.
No, it's all automatic. When UAC sends your details on to the uni's admissions office, they include all your subject marks so they can do it all without any paperwork.i thought for bonus points they would first refer to your eas application, then you would contact certain universities yourself showing whatever subject you studied that would get you the bonus, i'd prefer the service to be a bit more automatic
ah ok, that wouldn't help me though considering they botched my internal marks for english extension 1 and history extension.No, it's all automatic. When UAC sends your details on to the uni's admissions office, they include all your subject marks so they can do it all without any paperwork.
It's up to each uni to decide their admission standards in accordance with what they feel is appropriate for their program. I don't really see why all unis have to use exactly the same scheme, although I can see value in them cooperating on their decisions in this area and creating summary documentation to explain the bonus points schemes at each uni.i'm not going down that easily. new proposition: regulating all alternative entry schemes into one universal scheme
Some schemes give bonuses even for achieving a band 4/5 in Advanced English. They can be rather generous.ah ok, that wouldn't help me though considering they botched my internal marks for english extension 1 and history extension.
yeah but usyd are snobs and i want to be a snob so badSome schemes give bonuses even for achieving a band 4/5 in Advanced English. They can be rather generous.
Well, USyd sucksyeah but usyd are snobs and i want to be a snob so bad
hey anything that looks like hogwarts and lets me ransack through the joint without getting caught does not suck to meWell, USyd sucks![]()
i agree with universities cooperating with each other. fine, universities should attain a certain amount of autonomy but the variation in schemes make things rather complicated especially with a lot requiring students to contact these universities themselves, i'm only familiar with usyd and i know usyd will contact you automatically. so to save a lot of forms and time at least have these schemes work on an automated service to whatever applicants are fit.It's up to each uni to decide their admission standards in accordance with what they feel is appropriate for their program. I don't really see why all unis have to use exactly the same scheme, although I can see value in them cooperating on their decisions in this area and creating summary documentation to explain the bonus points schemes at each uni.
Four things:a few things i loathe about the hsc:
-ranks [i hate it how shit ranked people can influence your marks, even if its by .1 ~]
-how the universities admissions index or... the, now, atar is based upon one year of schooling*
*It'd be a lot fairer if it was based upon 2, or maybe even 3, years of schooling.. that way a greater work ethic throughout would be developed... i can hear a fair few erupting upon what i've just said, but i find that it's only fair
I think it just appears that way because the students who get 90+ are much more enthusiastic to share their result.to be honest, the assess marks i worked out from my school prior to the exams were pretty much identical to the exam mark i received, so it seems relatively fair.
and a question. is it just me or are there wayyyy more 90+s with the atar?