Random_87 said:
Directed at Bookie:
Mate, you wouldnt give John Skandalis a run in SOO over Ryles? are u crazy? Skandalis is so under rated, great player (hes no Nutley, but he is damn good).
So u think that :
*Hodgson
*Farrah
*Prince
*Marshall
*Richards
*Phatwiura (or however you spell it)
*Elford
*Fitzhenry
*Halatau
*Payten
*O'Neil
*Laffranchi
*and the rest of the good ones I forgot...
Are bad players? or B graders or whatever you call them.....
You gotta be joking! At the start of the season I thought they stood a good chance of making the 8 (not the top 4) but they have exceeded what I thought they would do. And they have some great players in key positions, how can you argue that there shit when you have Benji, Prince, Farrah and Hodgson supplying all the ball? (maybe not so much Hodgson, but hes a great gap runner).
Im afraid I dont get your view point Bookie, I think the tigers are very classy, and I want the sharkies to play more like them.
Mate, if you seriously think Skandalis has something over Ryles, then you haven't been watching the game hard enough! I suggest that you watch the Eels vs Dragons game again. Go have a look at his statistics for that match on the NRL site if it's not enough.
Now for that list of yours . . .
Hodgson, Prince and Marshall are all top quality.
Farah looks like he'll be a quality player, but right now he is still raw and unproven. Same with Dene Halatau.
Richards is big and strong, but I certainly would not choose him over Best and Naiqama at the Dragons.
Whatuira is decent, but he is a defensive turnstile. Watch closely to see how many tackles he drops off.
Elford and Fitzhenry are deadset average to say the least. Elford especially is one of the worst (definitely bottom five) centres in the NRL.
Payten and O'Neill are hard working players, but they have no quality whatsoever. Compare Payten to Bailey and O'Neill to Hindmarsh.
Laffranchi is so "good" that the Tigers don't even want him anymore, preferring Sam Harris in essence.
So yeah ... definitely a top squad there.