They also show that you fail in the years after.rewster said:The Tigers will probably win it. The experts are focusing on St George, Parramatta and Brisbane because they've been there before. The Warriors of 2002, Panthers of 2003, and Cowboys of 2004 show that form and not experience is good enough in the finals.
I'm a curry guy who's lived here since he was 2, who has been wierdly supporting South Africa for a while, and who goes for Bayern because he has an uncle who is married to an Irish Woman who lives in Germany.Random 87 said:The feeling is mutual my Bookie friend
And are you a Seth Efrican, mate? Because you support south Africa in your signature... and are you also German? because that genetical mishap could explain your patronizing comments.
You idiot! Yeah they show that they fail in years to come, but my point is that they played mad in the finals with little experience and so the Tigers will not have to worry! I'm not focusing on how the Tigers will go next year, I'm referring to how they may go this year. Idiot. Oh yeah, how have the Cowboys failed in "years after"? Malaka!Bookie said:They also show that you fail in the years after.
I'm a curry guy who's lived here since he was 2, who has been wierdly supporting South Africa for a while, and who goes for Bayern because he has an uncle who is married to an Irish Woman who lives in Germany.
How did the Panthers handle the pressure in 2003?Sonic said:I'm a big doggies fan though i really think parra will take it out..
if you think about it logically then it will be obious as the dragons will choke and the broncos have way to many injuries... the tigers have a chance but they are too newbie and can't handle the pressure.
additionally next week the eels will have all their players back in form..