Yet they get proportionately more welfare than any other demographic group in Australia. Yeah, sucks to be Boonger.
Last I checked, Europeans weren't force feeding them pure ethanol. They do that to themselves.
You spelt "their" wrong. I'm drunk and even I can spell better than you.
They also believed that they didn't technically own the land, so how can something be stolen off you if you don't believe that you own it?
They're quite welcome to go back to the desert and fuck goanas. I ain't going to stop them.
You've somehow turned their respect for the land into justification for the Europeans to steal it. I don't even know how that works.
Man you're a real tool.
Let me propose something. It's a fact that there is a higher proportion of Aborigines that live in poverty, have poor health, including drugs problems, have higher crime rates etc. Now - you either believe (A) that this is because of what has happened to them ie their treatment OR (B) you must believe that Aboriginal people are inherently inferior/more prone to sniff petrol/steal a car, that they are born this way. Make a decision or propose another option. I assume you are going to choose option B which makes you racist, no?
And criticising someone for spelling mistakes says far more than the spelling mistake.
Here's one point of many to rebut the assertion that the Aborigines were 'primtive'. The Aborigines figured out blood lines thousands of years before the Europeans. Fuck, many of the European royalty were dying of haemophilia due to imbreeding long after the Aborigines figured it out. If the 'primitive' Aborigines had figured it out - why couldn't the Europeans? Stupid primal Europeans marrying their sisters - disgusting!
''they get proportionately more welfare '' and yet an Aboriginal baby is more likely to be born into poverty than a 'white' one.
Last edited: