...Yet another contract law question! (1 Viewer)

Newbie

is a roflcopter
Joined
May 17, 2003
Messages
3,670
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
keke
contracts is the most fun so far
public is the worst omgggggggggg
 

Frigid

LLB (Hons)
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
6,208
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Newbie said:
keke
contracts is the most fun so far
i get public accredited already :p so that's ok...

ummm crim is bad for comlaw students :(

hows things toodz?
 

MoonlightSonata

Retired
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Messages
3,645
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
The parties can change the terms of the contract by agreement. Whether you intepret this as a termination by agreement of the original contract and an incorporation of the original terms into the a new contract, or simply a modification of the original contract, doesn't seem to present any great discrepency in result...
 

Newbie

is a roflcopter
Joined
May 17, 2003
Messages
3,670
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
oh damn
so im the only one going through how horribly stupid public is
jeez

Walker v NSW 182 clr 45
Submission Pt. 10: "The Parliaments of the commonwealth of australia and of the state lack the power to legislate in a manner affecting aboriginal people without the request and consent of the aborignal people."

man that shits stupider that my first moot submissions
 
Last edited:

MoonlightSonata

Retired
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Messages
3,645
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Asquithian said:
Mr Brown marked my paper and gave me high marks!

Yeah I read the whole book. But Crim one is good for understanding the substantive stuff when you get to session 2.

I can flip through my crim book and 95% of the pages are highlighted. I liked my crim reading! I read it all and high a stack of notes 10m high (hyperbole)...

Com law people generally love contracts and hate public and crim. It seems, in general, arts people are better able to deal with public law areas than com law people. (I'm being very general). Or at least com law people tend not to like public law areas.
Being arts/law, from what I've done --

Love:
- contracts
- property
- sale of goods/consumer protection

Like:
- public
- torts

Annoyed by:
- crim theory.

Bit of a paradox then?
 

Minai

Alumni
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
7,458
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
Uni Grad
2006
Thankfully you guys haven't experienced Taxation Law as yet (an option for Com/Law students, am I right?)

It has to be the driest law subject...boring cases about what is classified as assessable income or a fringe benefit that is brought all the way to the High Court.
 

Newbie

is a roflcopter
Joined
May 17, 2003
Messages
3,670
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
CP is very importatnt omg
those ten marks are so sexy
 

MoonlightSonata

Retired
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Messages
3,645
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Asquithian said:
What subjects are you doing this session? Crim and property? If you do property who do you have?
I'm doing crim and property - for property I have.. I think her name is Cathy? Anyway she's very good. I thought she was aggressive at first but now I realise she's just passionate - and teachers who are really interested in what they teach is always good.

Asquithian said:
I liked public except Sean Brennan marked everyone hard :\
I had Ed Santow for Public -- he was great! Very funny, enthusiastic, friendly, and a reasonable marker. Took us to see High Court reg and saw Kirby's chambers.

Asquithian said:
Contracts 1 was terrible. Mainly because we had a teacher that did not teach.
My teacher was terrible as well - very pretentious and not at all interested in what students had to say - Gail Pearson. Luckily she's left and is now teaching at USyd. The reason I did fine is because I already did contracts under a business law elective when I was at USyd. I had basically done both contracts 1 and 2 already, without having read any of the cases (except the old Carbolic Smoke Ball).
 

MoonlightSonata

Retired
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Messages
3,645
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
LOL I see my old commercial law lecturers still there, Pearl and Joe

I'm sure they'll just love their new addition heh
 

Frigid

LLB (Hons)
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
6,208
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
MS, so exactly what is your study background? how comes you're doing Crim this year and not the last?
 

MoonlightSonata

Retired
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Messages
3,645
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Frigid said:
MS, so exactly what is your study background? how comes you're doing Crim this year and not the last?
Because I transferred, altering the degree structure. In 2003 I was doing B. Information Technology at USyd, then transferred to BA/LLB, from 2004 to the present. When I was doing IT one of the electives involved business law subjects. As a result in 2003 I covered basically the whole of contracts 1 and 2, with less detail, namely not reading any of the cases. I also did property; personal, intellectual and land law, and also went over the tort of negligence and the Sale of Goods Act/consumer transactions/consumer protection, as well as TPA for misleading/deceptive conduct. It was very handy :)

Asquithian said:
From easter onwards the numbers are not right. Edgeworth told us to read different pages from those listed in the sheet.

For class 8 the readings only make sense if its 155-164, 173-176

Class 9 176 - 192
Class 10 193-217

Otherwise the chapters don't line up.
The sheet says --

Week 5. - 4 April:
Class 9. Limitation of actions: Ch.2, pp 178-94
Class 10. Doctrine of estates : Ch.3, pp 195-217

You were told to do different readings than those? He might have varied it slightly - we were just told to do the readings on the sheet
 

Frigid

LLB (Hons)
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
6,208
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
:eek: i just realised UNSW library doesn't subscribed to thomson lawbook online, only lexisnexis AU :(
 

Toodulu

werd!
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
1,335
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
heya newbzzzzz, nah i'm still at usyd doing com lib (haha i didn't sell out like you :p) (i'll have to rely on my 2 com+jap major and good looks to get a job)
although i am considering doing the CA even though i swore i wouldn't touch accounting after 1A :uhoh:
i'm doing commercial law which is a bundle of fun

oh no minai.. i think i will need to do taxation law if i want to do the CA program :( :(
 

jase_

Moderator Jase
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Messages
3,039
Location
St. Clair
Gender
Male
HSC
2001
Minai said:
Thankfully you guys haven't experienced Taxation Law as yet (an option for Com/Law students, am I right?)

It has to be the driest law subject...boring cases about what is classified as assessable income or a fringe benefit that is brought all the way to the High Court.
I have to do Taxation Law too, as do all Accounting major students :p. You can help me then! It's gotta be better than Company Law though?
 

Newbie

is a roflcopter
Joined
May 17, 2003
Messages
3,670
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
:D
thought you defected too since it was easier this year
i mean look... even frigid made it, would have been a sinch for you
oh well
please dont do accounting it makes you grow pimples in an L pattern on your forehead

lets just stick to our dream of marrying rich/hot/well-endowed/japanese lads/ladies :p
 

Frigid

LLB (Hons)
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
6,208
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Newbie said:
:D
thought you defected too since it was easier this year
i mean look... even frigid made it, would have been a sinch for you
hey com'on be fair john - i transferred from law-to-law.. thats diff. from transferring from comlibstd-to-law
 

Newbie

is a roflcopter
Joined
May 17, 2003
Messages
3,670
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
haha yeah im joking
chillaxpill4you :D

hows umm invading lawsoc?
 

Toodulu

werd!
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
1,335
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
i'm not sure how it's different but i'm sure when uac processed everyone's application they singled you out for the tougher selection criteria frigid

and yeh i got into unsw but i didn't go omg usyd has uber hot boys
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top