Sayangliss
Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2008
- Messages
- 90
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2009
Regarding censoring of information, we live with more free speech then alot of other nations. Simply put, I'm not that suspecious and with the world wide web at anyone's disposal, censoring information is almost impossible (well that is until Senator Conroy and his stupid legislation gets a foolish pass). You yourself is proof of that ability to obtain various sorts of information.
I don't have much of an opinion about Obama's cabinet yet, besides the fact that most within already have former experience in regards to their post. It is too early to tell in relation to the full capability of the Obama administration. However, I believe that his ability to provide people hope is more of a good thing then bad. If this 'change dogma' is to provide optimism, why should it not be used? It seems Obama has initiated on change, but one can always question, how much change is he willing to provide. It makes me feel sorry for him however, since there are so much expectations riding with him and only a knifes' edge chance of him fufilling them all.
M.L. King brought hope and a determination to stand for change in regards to civil rights. Obama is compared to him because some sees Obama in such a light as well, even if for different issues. Obama has leaders throughout the world hoping he is the person to allow various nations to improve their relations with America - chance for change. As for the comparisons with Kennedy, well, I'm going to wait and see.
Trying to bring this a little more on topic; through the actions of George W. Bush, many had lost hope in this man that stood up with his own stance against the 'war on terrorism'. Not saying all his decisions, particularly during the final years of his governance, was right, but he did what he thought was best for his country.
Maybe one day people might decide that Bush did leave some good after effects.... maybe.
I don't have much of an opinion about Obama's cabinet yet, besides the fact that most within already have former experience in regards to their post. It is too early to tell in relation to the full capability of the Obama administration. However, I believe that his ability to provide people hope is more of a good thing then bad. If this 'change dogma' is to provide optimism, why should it not be used? It seems Obama has initiated on change, but one can always question, how much change is he willing to provide. It makes me feel sorry for him however, since there are so much expectations riding with him and only a knifes' edge chance of him fufilling them all.
M.L. King brought hope and a determination to stand for change in regards to civil rights. Obama is compared to him because some sees Obama in such a light as well, even if for different issues. Obama has leaders throughout the world hoping he is the person to allow various nations to improve their relations with America - chance for change. As for the comparisons with Kennedy, well, I'm going to wait and see.
Trying to bring this a little more on topic; through the actions of George W. Bush, many had lost hope in this man that stood up with his own stance against the 'war on terrorism'. Not saying all his decisions, particularly during the final years of his governance, was right, but he did what he thought was best for his country.
Maybe one day people might decide that Bush did leave some good after effects.... maybe.