This is why gays/lesbians can't have kids (1 Viewer)

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweetness

Studies indicate that responsiveness to sugars and sweetness has very ancient evolutionary beginnings, being manifest as chemotaxis even in motile bacteria such as E. coli.[1] Newborn human infants also demonstrate preferences for high sugar concentrations and prefer solutions that are sweeter than lactose, the sugar found in breast milk.[2][3] Sweetness appears to have the highest taste recognition threshold, being detectable at around 1 part in 200 of sucrose in solution. By comparison, bitterness appears to have the lowest detection threshold, at about 1 part in 2 million for quinine in solution.[4] In the natural settings that human primate ancestors evolved in, sweetness intensity should indicate energy density, while bitterness tends to indicate toxicity[5][6][7] The high sweetness detection threshold and low bitterness detection threshold would have predisposed our primate ancestors to seek out sweet-tasting (and energy-dense) foods and avoid bitter-tasting foods. Even amongst leaf-eating primates, there is a tendency to prefer immature leaves, which tend to be higher in protein and lower in fibre and poisons than mature leaves.[8] The 'sweet tooth' thus has an ancient evolutionary heritage.
Masturbation then.
 

Garygaz

Active Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
1,827
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
wouldn't it just be as a result of the evolutionary trait of promoting procreation? natural urge to have sex - hence it feels good - humans found a way to receive pleasure which naturally occurs from intercourse without the second person involved.
 

Riproot

#MedLyf
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
8,228
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Uni Grad
2017
wouldn't it just be as a result of the evolutionary trait of promoting procreation? natural urge to have sex - hence it feels good - humans found a way to receive pleasure which naturally occurs from intercourse without the second person involved.
Aren't homosexuality and bisexuality just different forms of this?
Except instead of having no second person they have the same sex instead of the opposite.
 

Cianyx

Planarian Leader
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
358
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Does everything need an evolutionary purpose?
 

cosmo kramer

Banned
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
2,582
Location
Forever UNSW
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
Your line of argument is extraordinarily superficial, based upon this shallow idea that humans are merely and exclusively their external physique. They are so much more.

Your line of argument is extraordinarily superficial, based upon this shallow idea that humans are merely and exclusively their external physique. They are so much more.

Your line of argument is extraordinarily superficial, based upon this shallow idea that humans are merely and exclusively their external physique. They are so much more.

Your line of argument is extraordinarily superficial, based upon this shallow idea that humans are merely and exclusively their external physique. They are so much more.

worst post on this forum
 

Graney

Horse liberty
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
4,434
Location
Bereie
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
maybe, just MAYBE, there's something of a causal relationship between being raised by lesbians and, you know, having huge gender issues
There are so many studies on sexuality and gender identification of children raised by same sex couples, and it has no influence whatsoever.
 

Riproot

#MedLyf
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
8,228
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Uni Grad
2017
Your line of argument is extraordinarily superficial, based upon this shallow idea that humans are merely and exclusively their external physique. They are so much more.

Your line of argument is extraordinarily superficial, based upon this shallow idea that humans are merely and exclusively their external physique. They are so much more.

Your line of argument is extraordinarily superficial, based upon this shallow idea that humans are merely and exclusively their external physique. They are so much more.

Your line of argument is extraordinarily superficial, based upon this shallow idea that humans are merely and exclusively their external physique. They are so much more.
 

Graney

Horse liberty
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
4,434
Location
Bereie
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
it just is

Your peers are far more influential than home environment, parents don't really matter.
 

cosmo kramer

Banned
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
2,582
Location
Forever UNSW
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
do you really htink i don't know that the NSE is more important than SE in determining personality
 

Graney

Horse liberty
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
4,434
Location
Bereie
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I have no idea what I'm talking about, your references are too meta.
 

Ivorytw

Middle Management
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
1,067
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
I'm lactose intolerant and fat because of chocolate.
 

funkshen

dvds didnt exist in 1991
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
2,137
Location
butt
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
chocolate also has a lot of tryptophan, which would biologically explain why we should like it as it is beneficial to us.
 

Garygaz

Active Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
1,827
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
chocolate has glucose, glucose is energy? fat is actually a good thing on humans (not aesthetically, though practically).
 

funkshen

dvds didnt exist in 1991
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
2,137
Location
butt
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
chocolate has glucose, glucose is energy? fat is actually a good thing on humans (not aesthetically, though practically).
actually aesthetically pleasing and practical!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top