There is a difference between abiogenesis and evolution.i do believe in that! i thought you meant that we all came from one cell
There is a difference between abiogenesis and evolution.i do believe in that! i thought you meant that we all came from one cell
Well i sincerely apologise that i confused the twoThere is a difference between abiogenesis and evolution.
that too, i dont know enough about biology to go into it but i'd rather believe in that than some divine being who no1 except for a select few have ever interacted with before without any1 ever seeing them do it created everything and that every1 on earth is an inbreedi do believe in that! i thought you meant that we all came from one cell
In Christianity Jesus is God, so many people interacted with himthat too, i dont know enough about biology to go into it but i'd rather believe in that than some divine being who no1 except for a select few have ever interacted with before without any1 ever seeing them do it created everything and that every1 on earth is an inbreed
And when I mean difference, I mean big difference lol. Probably means that you have a lot of misconceptions about evolution.Well i sincerely apologise that i confused the two
thats where faith comes inthat too, i dont know enough about biology to go into it but i'd rather believe in that than some divine being who no1 except for a select few have ever interacted with before without any1 ever seeing them do it created everything and that every1 on earth is an inbreed
the bible teaches that "whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mark 11:24)thats where faith comes in
Does it say it will be yours instantly? No. After the end of this system there will be no sickness so amputees would have restored limbsthe bible teaches that "whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mark 11:24)
we do not know of any instance of God restoring amputated limbs; for all intents and purposes, it has never happened.
if you "have faith" in the bible, you must conclude one of two things:
1) no amputee has ever prayed to God for a restored limb
2) no amputee has ever had enough faith to deserve a restored limb
which one is it?
you realise that jesus never said that he's god right, hes always referred to himself as son of god. then some centuries after his death a bunch of christians just came up with the idea of the trinity to unify things cos ppl were asking questionsIn Christianity Jesus is God, so many people interacted with him
yes because faith always trumps logic rightthats where faith comes in
"He will call upon me, and I will answer him; I will be with him in trouble, I will deliver him and honor him." (Psalm 91:15)Does it say it will be yours instantly? No. After the end of this system there will be no sickness so amputees would have restored limbs
Are you an amputee? and i already answered you"He will call upon me, and I will answer him; I will be with him in trouble, I will deliver him and honor him." (Psalm 91:15)
"So I say to you: Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you." (Luke 11:9)
god is clearly not picking up the phone when amputees are ringing
and im out of there because yall are a bunch of goons
no you didn't, you gave a bullshit response that is not supported by any biblical references. prayer fulfillment is definitely a temporal phenomenon. regardless, your argument is seriously shit because you wouldn't be able to tell whether a prayer is ever answered or not. this is, in fact, far from the 'truth', where there are objective criteria both for prayer fulfillment (a humble heart, wholeheartedness, faith, righteousness, obedience) and prayer denial (disobedience, sin, indifference, neglect of mercy, despising the Law, bloodguilt, iniquity, stubbornness, doubt, self-indulgence).Are you an amputee? and i already answered you
okay well thats your problem then if the answers dont satisfy you but nothing you say is affecting me or my beliefs right now sono you didn't, you gave a bullshit response that is not supported by any biblical references. prayer fulfillment is definitely a temporal phenomenon. regardless, your argument is seriously shit because you wouldn't be able to tell whether a prayer is ever answered or not. this is, in fact, far from the 'truth', where there are objective criteria both for prayer fulfillment (a humble heart, wholeheartedness, faith, righteousness, obedience) and prayer denial (disobedience, sin, indifference, neglect of mercy, despising the Law, bloodguilt, iniquity, stubbornness, doubt, self-indulgence).
of course i'm not an amputee you goose
You didn't just say that: "10 And all Mine are Yours, and Yours are Mine, and I am glorified in them." JOhn 17:10 - clear equality with Godyou realise that jesus never said that he's god right, hes always referred to himself as son of god. then some centuries after his death a bunch of christians just came up with the idea of the trinity to unify things cos ppl were asking questions
protip: jehovah's witnesses don't believe jesus is god, ergo persecution by mainstream christiansYou didn't just say that: "10 And all Mine are Yours, and Yours are Mine, and I am glorified in them." JOhn 17:10 - clear equality with God
IN the same book it's even clearer: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth 15 John bore witness of Him" John 1:1, 14-15
I am the First and the Last. 18 I am He who lives, and was dead Revelation 1:17-18 - even JW have this in their BIble!
I know that. I'm just saying that they neglected to change that part of the Bible. I'm guessing soon they will.protip: jehovah's witnesses don't believe jesus is god, ergo persecution by mainstream christians
in case you didn't realise, there is a 'solid' case for non-Trinitarian christian sects, yet i don't think mainstream christians are going to amend the bible to change the parts that support their argumentI know that. I'm just saying that they neglected to change that part of the Bible. I'm guessing soon they will.
And it's not persecution but disagreement.
No, it's the nontrinitarian sects who have changed the bible to suit themselves. What's ur point?in case you didn't realise, there is a 'solid' case for non-Trinitarian christian sects, yet i don't think mainstream christians are going to amend the bible to change the parts that support their argument
also being given a dose of Zyklon-B is persecution, in my books