Post-election secession pleas hit White House (1 Viewer)

byebyebye

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
33
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
What began as a small group of citizens voicing their disappointment with President Barack Obama's victory in last week's presidential election, has turned into a plea from hundreds of thousands of citizens to have their states be granted independence from the federal government.
The White House has now received secession petitions from all 50 states by citizens requesting that the administration "peacefully grant" them the opportunity to form their own sovereign government.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/postele...white-house-20121115-29dzp.html#ixzz2CLCzNFZw
What are your thoughts on this? Any idea on how successful this will be?
 

halapenyo

Active Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2011
Messages
1,200
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
"hundreds of thousands". that wont really mean much in a country with 300+ million people.
 

Lolsmith

kill all boomers
Joined
Dec 4, 2009
Messages
4,570
Location
Forever UNSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
They won't be successful without any sort of armed conflict

I really hope murika has a civil war over this
 

byebyebye

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
33
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
They won't be successful without any sort of armed conflict

I really hope murika has a civil war over this
When the next civil war occurs, it will not be regional like the last one. It will be man vs. state. In the instance of Texas, it will be the people vs. the federal government, while in places like Indiana and Kentucky (where the state governments walk hand-in-hand with the feds and will probably back them) it will be the people vs. the state and feds. The general consensus of the US military is that they would not be reliable to the federal government for domestic war. There are too many in active and reserve duty now talking about this possibility. That is why the Federal government has and is training foreign forces for urban combat. They will need the help. They will lose.

We gonna have slave states again.
You do realise that the civil war wasn't over slavery right. Also slaves existed in both the north and the south at the time.

texas has 70k alone
I think it's over 100k now. Only 25k is needed though to warrant a response from Washington
 
Last edited:

funkshen

dvds didnt exist in 1991
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
2,137
Location
butt
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
the civil war was about preserving the union, but to claim that it wasn't over slavery considering the abolitionist policy of the republicans, and the acquiescence of northern democrats to the republican agenda, to claim that it wasn't 'over slavery' is fucking retarded. just like claiming there's going to be another civil war, or the fact that foreign soldiers are being given "urban combat training" is to fight in coming american civil war.
 

moll.

Learn to science.
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
3,545
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Who is byebyebye? Is it whoever made solo's troll creating another even more ridiculous troll? ~inception~
 

funkshen

dvds didnt exist in 1991
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
2,137
Location
butt
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
anyone who names themselves after an 'N Sync song is trouble
 

Lolsmith

kill all boomers
Joined
Dec 4, 2009
Messages
4,570
Location
Forever UNSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
When the next civil war occurs, it will not be regional like the last one. It will be man vs. state. In the instance of Texas, it will be the people vs. the federal government, while in places like Indiana and Kentucky (where the state governments walk hand-in-hand with the feds and will probably back them) it will be the people vs. the state and feds. The general consensus of the US military is that they would not be reliable to the federal government for domestic war. There are too many in active and reserve duty now talking about this possibility. That is why the Federal government has and is training foreign forces for urban combat. They will need the help. They will lose.
....what
anyone who names themselves after an 'N Sync song is trouble
more so than the person who can point this out???
 

Azure

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
5,681
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
When the next civil war occurs, it will not be regional like the last one. It will be man vs. state. In the instance of Texas, it will be the people vs. the federal government, while in places like Indiana and Kentucky (where the state governments walk hand-in-hand with the feds and will probably back them) it will be the people vs. the state and feds. The general consensus of the US military is that they would not be reliable to the federal government for domestic war. There are too many in active and reserve duty now talking about this possibility. That is why the Federal government has and is training foreign forces for urban combat. They will need the help. They will lose.



You do realise that the civil war wasn't over slavery right. Also slaves existed in both the north and the south at the time.



I think it's over 100k now. Only 25k is needed though to warrant a response from Washington
Where'd you get this number from?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top