HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive) (6 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon





(above results and the one in the 3U thread are verified since they come from the book, Summation of Series - Jolley)
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

First transforming the wanted inequality so its easier to solve:





This is what we need to prove, transforming the above AM-GM inequality:



So we simply need to select numbers a_1, a_2, ... , a_n so that we get (*)

For simplicity sake, let

Now we find a_1 so that we yield (*)





Yielding yielding the wanted inequality.
 

Trebla

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
8,392
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

I like how you answer your own questions
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

I like how you answer your own questions
Because some people want to know solutions of these questions?

In the past people have asked for solutions to a lot of these questions, and I thought this thread would be of little benefit to people if they don't know the solutions to these questions.
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Sure I'll just leave all questions here that are old to be unanswered rather than post the solutions for other people to benefit
No need to be sarcastic about it =)
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Post solutions that does not involve divergence/convergence? Thx.
I'm afraid you would have to prove the sum converges in order to find it, however I doubt that the Sydney grammar teachers who made this question expected students to do so.









-> A Sydney Grammar teacher may be satisfied with simply the statement that u_n is increasing therefore 1/u_n converges to zero (I could be wrong, I don't know the marking criteria, however that is my guess), however a rigorous proof of the limit is given below:















 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

A point P is chosen inside the unit square at random. What is the probability that P is closer to the centre of the square than any side thereof?

Bonus: Solve this for a cube, replacing the word "side" with "face".
 

Fred2013

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2013
Messages
34
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

I'm afraid you would have to prove the sum converges in order to find it, however I doubt that the Sydney grammar teachers who made this question expected students to do so.









-> A Sydney Grammar teacher may be satisfied with simply the statement that u_n is increasing therefore 1/u_n converges to zero (I could be wrong, I don't know the marking criteria, however that is my guess), however a rigorous proof of the limit is given below:















Thx Sy123.
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

A point P is chosen inside the unit square at random. What is the probability that P is closer to the centre of the square than any side thereof?

Bonus: Solve this for a cube, replacing the word "side" with "face".
On first thoughts, you would just construct a circle within the square which has a radius a quarter that of the side length of the square. Then do the area of the circle divided by the area of the square. Similarly for the bonus, you construct a sphere and do the volume of the sphere divided by the volume of the cube.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

I got,

I want to figure out the bonus before I post my solution for this one.
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

On first thoughts, you would just construct a circle within the square which has a radius a quarter that of the side length of the square. Then do the area of the circle divided by the area of the square. Similarly for the bonus, you construct a sphere and do the volume of the sphere divided by the volume of the cube.
Nah, the regions won't be circles and spheres.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Will check now...I didn't actually do the calculation.
Its just 4 times the area bounded by the region (in the Cartesian plane where the square's co-ordinates are (0,0) (1,0) (1,1) and (0,1) ) , ??
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Its just 4 times the area bounded by the region (in the Cartesian plane where the square's co-ordinates are (0,0) (1,0) (1,1) and (0,1) ) , ??
yeah that sounds about right
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

I got:

(4*sqrt(2)-5)/3 and am pretty confident about it...
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

I got:

(4*sqrt(2)-5)/3 and am pretty confident about it...
Well firstly I found the complementary probability, the probability that its closer to the face instead :/
And even then I still get the wrong answer because I don't know to find the area of a triangle properly and used the wrong base length.

I think it should be, and I'm not bothered to do the calculation again



The above is supposed to be 4 times the area of the region bounded by the cartesian equations:






dem mistakes
 
Last edited:

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Well firstly I found the complementary probability, the probability that its closer to the face instead :/
And even then I still get the wrong answer because I don't know to find the area of a triangle properly and used the wrong base length.

I think it should be, and I'm not bothered to do the calculation again



The above is supposed to be 4 times the area of the region bounded by the cartesian equations:






dem mistakes
Yeah your equations are pretty similar to mine. Did mine quite carefully so am pretty sure its right. Will try the 3d one in a sec.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)

Top