the dynamic with the father and child was caring cos he loved her and wanted to help her, i think i just said the mother was judgy
i was also like there is a voyeuristic tone from the writer as they were 3rd person and looking in on the whole "dynamic", maybe you could have talked about the title "Trust" but i didn't have time.
surely if ur take and analysis is good they give us good marks for that bruh, like even if u said something different because im sure everybody had different takes on it. my take was more to the latter one, but idk if it is right coz that's what i thought in the exam.
surely if ur take and analysis is good they give us good marks for that bruh, like even if u said something different because im sure everybody had different takes on it. my take was more to the latter one, but idk if it is right coz that's what i thought in the exam.
i thought their family was disconnected, as at one point the father didn't pay attention to the daughter, and then the next minute he is not paying attention to his wife, so surely that was a dynamic that could be picked up on?
I think so, in the hsc they cant take away marks for stuff u don't have only give marks for stuff u do have (unless what you don't have was like the one thing it needed)
it's more abt analysis coz u can't always have crazy techniques, but if ur overall response is good im sure it is possible coz for internals one time i got 5/5 for a question with like 1 or 2 actual techniques