Search results

lol...read the legal statement, i bet it would say "the author and publisher of this book can not be held reliable for any negligent or misleading answer" blah blah blah they're covered :p

gotcha....yeah it's relevant for (d)- the 10 mark question. but it can't be relevant for (c) because the guy and all of his friends were Australians (unfortunately)... poor girl :(

OH O.K. ffs...i'll do it for you. Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company 1893 is the more clear of the two (p. 15 Heineman). Issues: "Could the company (which is the manufacturer here, not the retailer) enter into a contract with anyone by making an offer (i.e. the 100 pounds reward) to the...

Consumer law (the topic) aside, the 2 case studied i listed specifically specify that a contract exists and there for the consumers were compensated in both cases.... In this case if i wasn't doing consumers i put put tort easily for question 8, but consumers teaches you that every consumer...

14 pages for crime????????????????/ wow like questions (a) and (b) were a 3 lines question for the first and like maybe 4 lines for the second. hmmm And btw international crime was in last year's HSC rofl, i knew it even before the exam, which is why i didn't study for it. yay me, NOT

OMG Donogue v Stevens and Carlil v carbolic smoke ball company pick up your text book and read it. The whole of it. Same to you Laz and whoever thinks such a contract doesn't exist alrite? Enough is enough guys

*Cough* It was i who mentioned sexual assault penalties for section (d), of course they're relevant. The question asks about penalties, i.e. the type of penalties prescribed by the legal system and the penalties for specific crimes. Don't you all remember the dude who got 55 years in gaol for...

gl everyone i hope everyone get what they hoped for :)

i put contract and i can see how both could be right lol bad bad

for family, i would say maintenance/court orders, child support agency etc. for example (from my effectiveness essay). Despite of the introduction of the Child Support Agency (CSA) in 1984, 30% of children of separated parents do not recieve maintenance. Non payment of child support will be...

share with us what you wrote and we'll give you an idea....

He wouldn't be able to understand half of what i would say becoz of my accent and due to the fact that i could hardly breathe so i would say 2 words and start grasping for air hmmm awkward is the right word indeed

this is very very very interesting, when i read the compliance question in the exam i didn't know what to write about it whatsoever!!! Honestly, congratulations to everyone who wrote about it because i hold myself to know both consumers and family pretty nicely and i was just in shock from...

and i'm not disputing David's last name :p i just pulled his case out of my ass in the examination because i just tried to write as much as i can... And yes, you would lose marks for not referring to the stimulus in question c, i sure as hell gonna lose some coz i didn't refer either, didn't...

lol Ms 12 no, i'm talking about one of the leaders of the lebanses community in Melbourne, Bilal Kazal, he is wanted in Lebanon for affiliation with the Hezbollah or some other terrorist rganisation but the goverment chose not to extradite him and not even try and prosecute him or take anyy...

Mate you dunno what the hell you're talking about....even if you end up being right it's not for the right reasons.... In Donoghue v Stevens there was a rulling that a contract exists regardless of who buys the bottler. Every single consumer transaction is a contract between the store, the...

As a student who does consumer law and knows it very well i am completely puzzled. In the angle of conusmers this ios contract law no question. However, if in the syllabus this thing is tied with tort then it might be tort, because donoghue and stevens is very very similar to the scenario in...

I don't get extra marks, just the right to type. There's simply no other choice, i can't use a writer because it's very hard for me to speak fast and articulately in english because i'm a newly arrived immigrant...

You're right, it's very confusing now that i read the whole case. It does not matter who the contract is with, but because it was under duty of care in the tort law section, then they might decide it as such. Very confusing. The entire consumer law topic contradicts the answer of tort...

i have a wrist disability....yes i can type, no i can't play basketball, tennis, cricket, anything like that...