Search results

To add to that - Russian defeat and revolution in 1917: probably hastened the end of the war as Germany. Many expected the war to continue on to 1920-21. - Arrival of technology and 'total warfare' tactic adopted which made technology not a side issue of the war but a decisive weapon. But this...

cheers bud

re: The Official F1 Thread thanks for the technological insights. with my lack of that kind of knowledge i'm left to judging F1 cars to how they look aesthetically :) interesting how it's only the mclarens that have the 'bull horns'. I remember reading an F1 racing interview saying either the...

Mcgrath- Fortunately Stuey Clark has timed his selection run to perfection, but the real test will be when he plays in pitches that don't suit him e.g. West Indies, India, Pakistan. Ben Hilfenhaus is looking like a future contender too and a future CA contract holder. Warne- Simply...

i missed out when they studied propaganda are there any useful sites to revise on it? im referring to both Allied and Central Powers propaganda, any years of the great war

Basically the trench was a defensive structure, designed to consolidate gains. Look at the German trenches they were well set-in with windows in their foxholes and concrete pillboxes and such. Add to what Robbeh said the 19th century tactics took time to move into the 20th century, and as...

oh damni missed mark taylor in the dressing room. warney looking baffled like someone who just received his flipper... like they said, never change a winning team. especially one winning convingcingly

did you necessarily need a historians view, because i have with me a book of eyewitness accounts. of course someone like wellington was not a historian in a sense that it was not his occupation but his view is as valid as a historians.

^ i got a friend who plays for WPH, well used to, only under-16 stuff though. myself i'm only a spectator, not a player at all

I could watch that Panesar over and over again. It was perfect Gilly batting, straight, and powerful

i'm thinking somewhere along the lines of "-Analyze the historical subjectivity in the written history of the Battle of Waterloo" I'm finding it hard to put that into a question, without looking too simple.

^ but isn't that the case for all extensions?

i'm still confused as to how i should approach my major project, which is the contrasting approach to the battle of waterloo. do i need new conclusions, my own conclusions to the core topic? or do i just analyse the sources i use to in regards to historiography?

If the syllabus says 2500, shouldn't everyone stick to it? I guess it's hard to implement since the major project is internally marked (which is a large downfall of this course IMO)

aaah kyo. j'aime bien kyo. et aussi le chanson d'Indochine.. crap I forgot the title. it's the music video with the little kid/s singing too.

so it is to the power of negative 11? my substitute physics teacher said it was positive 11

i need a bit of revision, when is "en" or "le/la/les" used?

That one is easy "Mais Non" Je ne sais pas, tu peut le poser a Einstein, mais il est mort donc tant pis

pennant hills high..

Ouch two OHS subjects. Obviously I don't know how well you can cope with it, I guess having an Italian background (and I'm inferring one of your relatives speak Italian) will make it easier but ultimately it's you who will learn the language. I've always learnt languages through a teacher and I...