Search results

2 or so hours to look over every single question :p

rofl @ logs

Wow that sums me up completely :) BSc(Computer Science)/BSc(Pure Mathematics) @ unsw :D

4 unit mathematics covers it. I think?

It means any number > 18 can be made solely of a number of 4 and 7 cents stamps. Ie 18, 19, 20, 21 ...

Yup put height as 2 instead of 1/2. fixed now

Haha I completely missed that. So you need y' = 3x[sup]2 – 12x + 9 < 0. This happens at 1 < x < 3, doesnt it? It cant be x < 2. Take for example x = 0 (which is < 2). y' = 9 which is > 0. Also for the series question, I figured that 0 terms would equate to a sum of 0, but I guess its...

Yes but its not integrating sin(x), its integrating sin(e-x)

The CSSA trial?

Here it is. Tell me of any errors in answers and/or spelling or transcription errors. Credit where credits due: Q8: FinalFantasy Q10: Xayma

Sounds like a plan :p

Haha thats where the problem comes in. Not many mathematicians that I have spoken to will accept it as definitive proof unless someone can actually prove it without the aid of computers. Ive talked to the head of the Department of Combinatorics and Optimization in Waterloo, who claims to have...

Totally agree. Hence the transfer to comp science/pure maths next year @ unsw :)

perhaps, but you are a mormon! @ cube root of 5, i knew how to prove it :p Just all i could think of at the time and i was looking at next weeks tutorial questions at the same time

With highlarious results.

Its being worked on by a few people. Will be up by weekend hopefully

That is extremely easy. Firstly they'd have to tell you that ei@ = cos@ + isin@ or in some way get you to prove it. From there all you have to do is sub pi in.

No its not, all CSSA exams have to have been done by now.

source: http://www.mathpages.com/

prove cubed root of 5 is irrational